Businesses Brace For Gulf Oil Spill Impact

May 4, 2010

Businesses along the Florida Panhandle area bracing for disaster as an oil spill looms in the Gulf of Mexico.

capt.jpg“I’m looking at maybe no business for the rest of 2010,” said John Rivers (pictured), of Gulf Breeze, who owns a charter fishing boat business. “And if the oil affects the breeding grounds there may not be anything next year at all. I’m looking for work.”

Rivers, who has run Mega-Bite Inshore Charters for six years, said almost all of his bookings for June have canceled because of the publicity surrounding the spill.

Florida emergency operations officials said the oil could reach the shores of Escambia County by Wednesday depending on the ocean currents.

BP, which has been unable to contain the spill thus far, is expected to try another method that involves placing a dome over the well. That containment method has been used in other spills; however, it has never been used on a well in 5,000 feet of water. If the dome containment process fails, the next step would be to drill a relief well to redirect the oil. That process could take two to three months, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Michael Sole said Monday.

“We do really need to get this discharge to stop,” he said. “They need to plug the hole.”

Gov. Charlie Crist originally declared a state of emergency for Escambia, Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton, Bay and Gulf counties but extended it Monday morning to include 13 more counties as far south as Sarasota County. As much as 770 miles of Gulf front property could be affected by the spill.

The impact could be devastating – and wide-reaching.

“It can affect everything in an economy that is strongly based on tourism or fisheries,” said Stephen Holland, professor of tourism, recreation and sport management at the University of Florida.

oilmap11.jpgFlorida fisheries have not yet been directly affected by the spill in a physical sense. Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson said in a statement Monday that seafood currently being harvested is safe to eat. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is restricting commercial and recreational fishing in federal waters from Louisiana to an area off Pensacola Bay, but that ban does not yet impact waters extended out 25 miles from Escambia County.

State officials said there is the potential for additional closures, though, and that the state is working with federal partners to determine how and when to make that decision.

Holland said in some ways, the spill is like a strong rip tide in that it may keep people out of the water for a while. But a rip tide usually goes away after a few days, whereas the effects of the spill could last for weeks, or even months. It would be natural he said, for people to change vacation plans out of concern, thus creating an impact on local hotels and restaurants.

“They could choose to drive to Hilton Head or Myrtle Beach in the Carolinas instead of coming to the Panhandle,” he said.

Pensacola Convention and Visitors Bureau spokeswoman Laura Lee said that the visitors bureau is getting lots of phone calls from people worried about Memorial Day weekend or summer vacation plans. Pensacola officials, she said, are hoping that many tourists will still come to see the historic downtown and the air museum. But the beach is still what draws many visitors to the area, she said.

“Our beaches are the number one attraction here, so it would hurt us greatly,” said Lee.

Dave Rauschkolb, a Seaside restaurateur who also organized February’s “Hands Across the Sand” beach protest against legislative efforts to open Florida’s Gulf waters to drilling, said most Panhandle businesses don’t seem to have suffered an immediate decline stemming from the spill in Louisiana, but most are anxious.

“I think anybody who lives up or down the Gulf coast is afraid of this oil spill,” Rauschkolb said.

Comments

7 Responses to “Businesses Brace For Gulf Oil Spill Impact”

  1. David Huie Green on May 5th, 2010 11:05 am

    REGARDING:
    “Why dont we just get the water with the oil out of there?”

    They are trying.

    The problem is that it is covering several thousand square miles and is not coming up in one small space. Where possible they burn off the thicker sections but the average depth is of the oil on the surface is just thousandths of an inch thick.

    Even if you only skimmed the top inch to separate out the oil from the water, you would be taking in 2,323.2 cubic feet of mixture per square mile or over two million cubic feet per thousand square mile or 17.4 million gallons or 414,000 barrels.

    That is a heap of work to deal with and is why they don’t instantly fix the problem.

    David for getting to the petroleum before it mixes with water

  2. cassandra on May 5th, 2010 8:06 am

    Why dont we just get the water with the oil out of there?

  3. Jeff Etheridge on May 4th, 2010 10:38 pm

    Every time I read the Comments section, I get depressed. The repeated inability of respondents to read and comprehend a basic informational story just astounds me.

    You have the people that will make President Obama the scapegoat of any situation and try to turn any issue into a personal soapbox.
    You have the people that feel that every story is some kind of personal affront to their situation.
    You have the people that just want to be argumentative.

    Are there any people left that think for themselves?

    Except Mr. D.H. Green?

  4. huh on May 4th, 2010 11:30 am

    The republicans pushed for drilling near our coasts for many years. Obama finally caved in and let them have their way.

    Which, I think most dems did not really disagree with as its better than foreign oil. But , the huge lack of safety is the main problem

  5. come on on May 4th, 2010 9:46 am

    And what would the President have done if he arrived earlier? Come on…he couldn’t have done anything more than he’s doing now…yeah, yeah, we get it, lots of people are upset that he’s President…tough! He’s President and will be for at least the next few years. GET OVER IT! Why not, try supporting the President and lets work together instead of pouting about it!

  6. Pilgrim Hills on May 4th, 2010 9:39 am

    Why did Obama agree to expand drilling into new areas in the Gulf just two months ago? Why did it take him 12 days to come down here after 11 people died and our entire eco system is threatened?

  7. No, to drilling in the Gulf on May 4th, 2010 8:58 am

    No, to drilling in the Gulf!!!!

    Mr. J. Miller said that he’s still for drilling off the coast of Florida , because they would be drilling for gas not oil! This is crazy, because no matter what your drilling for, you get everything that comes up — gas — oil —- sulfur — water waste ( Miller, just doesn’t understand how it works) !

    It is not safe, just as this major oil spill proved!!! Any valves can fail ! There is no such thing as a fail prove valve!

    Drill on land where spills can be taken care of ! It certainly Can’t be taken care of in the Gulf!