Questions Raised About Proposed Florida Pot Rule

February 28, 2015

A lawyer for the Legislature is questioning the Department of Health’s proposed medical-marijuana rule, slated for a public vetting on Monday.

The top lawyer for the Joint Administrative Procedures Committee raised concerns this week about a variety of issues, including a scoring system proposal to decide “dispensing organizations” that will grow, process and distribute the non-euphoric marijuana legalized last year.

The proposal under scrutiny is the department’s second stab at creating a framework for types of cannabis that are low in euphoria-inducing tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, and high in cannabadiol, or CBD, authorized by the Legislature and Gov. Rick Scott last year for patients who suffer from severe spasms or cancer. An administrative law judge tossed the department’s first attempt at a rule, finding fault with a proposed lottery to choose five nurseries across the state to kick off Florida’s pot industry.

The latest plan, issued after a rare “negotiated rule” workshop last month, replaces the lottery with a scoring system. The weighted scorecard would rate applicants based on cultivation (30 percent), processing (30 percent), dispensing (15 percent), financials (20 percent) and medical director (5 percent).

But, in a 14-page letter Thursday to the health department’s Office of Compassionate Use Director Patricia Nelson, the legislative committee’s chief attorney, Marjorie Holladay, suggested that the proposed scoring system is too vague.

“It does not appear that part III of the application contains any ascertainable minimum thresholds or standards to demonstrate each item,” Holladay wrote.

Under the law, five nurseries that have been in business for 30 years or longer and cultivate at least 400,000 plants would be eligible to apply for licenses in five regions.

But Holladay’s letter also requested an explanation of the department’s decision to allow “dispensing organizations” to grow the product in one place, process it in another and distribute it in other locations, the same issue that prompted a request for a hearing Monday on the proposed rule.

The Joint Administrative Procedures Committee plays a key role in overseeing state regulations and frequently requests more information when new rules are proposed. Two months before Administrative Law Judge W. David Watkins struck down the original proposal in November, Holladay sent health officials a similar inquiry.

In Thursday’s letter, she also asked why health officials are asking applicants to provide information about their relationships with independent laboratories because nothing in the proposed rule requires testing, an expensive process that could raise the cost imposed by the rule, another issue brought up by Holladay.

Florida law requires legislative approval of rules if regulatory costs for all the businesses that participate in the program exceed $200,000 in one year, or $1 million over five years. At last month’s negotiating session, the 12-member panel, hand-picked by health officials, went to great lengths to eliminate costs directly associated with the rule, instead embedding them into the application.

The committee estimated that 15 nurseries would apply for the licenses, bringing the cumulative cost of the rule to just under $1 million.

But the proposal does not address how much the biannual renewal fee would be, Holladay noted.

“Depending on the amount of this fee, the statutory threshold for legislative ratification could be triggered, especially because there will be three renewal fees to be paid by the five dispensing organizations seeking renewal within five years after implementation of the rule,” Holladay wrote.

Health officials had wanted to avoid legislative approval in order to get the product to eligible patients sooner. The law had required the department to have selected the five dispensing organizations by Jan. 1 of this year, but the legal challenge created a delay.

Senate Regulated Industries Chairman Rob Bradley, whose panel is expected to take up other medical-medical marijuana legislation this session and who was instrumental in passage of the low-THC measure last year, said he wants the issue resolved.

“If it’s required, it needs to be done,” Bradley, R-Fleming Island, said.

by Dara Kam, The News Service of Florida

Comments

6 Responses to “Questions Raised About Proposed Florida Pot Rule”

  1. 429SCJ on March 4th, 2015 2:55 am

    @Phillip, the fall of America had nothing to do with pot. It had to do with turning the monetary/banking system over to special interest. It had to do with supporting middle east land grabs and one opened ended war after another to the tune of 18,000,000,000,000., unbridled immigration and on and on.

    It is easy to blame pot for our leaders blunders, and comforting to have a stiff drink and a cigarette to get over it.

    Hypocrisy!

  2. mike on March 2nd, 2015 7:41 am

    I take apx 6000 RX pills a year,a pain pump,active lupus and i am still in pain and in bed.this is “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”….
    Over 1/2 of America is legal …
    Florida get it together.
    WHY SHOULD I MOVE…..
    I gave 4 years of my life in the military for the LOVE i have for America and the FREEDOM.

  3. Denise on March 2nd, 2015 6:01 am

    Philip YOU NEED to EDUCATE yourself on this subject BEFORE you open your mouth THIS CHAROLET’S WEB DOES NOT get you high but it DOES HELP children go fro 300 sezuriers a week to 3 -6 GET EDUCATED NO SIDE EFFECTS . I am sick of people WHO HAVE OPINON HOWEVER NO REAL KNOWLEGE about the real FACTS!!!!!

  4. philip on March 2nd, 2015 12:48 am

    Based on the rapid decline of the U.S morals in the last few years, does anyone(sober and drug free) see the need to add another mind altering substance to the mix? How many stupid things have been done in the past few years? Many. So why do we need to add more mind altered people to the mix? Are you pro drug people on drugs? I guess the fall of the Roman empire came because the people were fat dumb and happy and got bored with being on top. Oh well, I guess history does say over and over that one generation of idiots does a civilization doom and the cycle starts over. Also, that one generation never thinks they are IT or they wouldn’t do it.

  5. me on February 28th, 2015 10:51 am

    It’s just a plant. Make it legal and get it over with. Alcohol is legal and its dangerous, cigarettes are legal and they are dangerous but if someone choose to use those things it is there choice.

  6. 429SCJ on February 28th, 2015 5:34 am

    Chasing the tail.





Have a comment on this story?

We welcome your comments on this story, but there are some rules to follow::

(1) Be Nice. No comments that slander another, no racism, no sexism, no personal attacks.

(2) No Harrassing Comments. If someone says something bad about you, don't respond. That's childish.

(3) No Libel. That's saying something is not true about someone. Don't do it.

(4) Keep it clean. Nothing vulgar, obscene or sexually related. No profanity or obvious substitutions. Period.

(5) NorthEscambia.com reserves the right to remove any comments that violate our rules or we think to be inappropriate. We are not responsible for what is posted. Comments may not appear right away until they are approved by a moderator.

(6) Limit your comments to the subject in this story only, and limit comments to 300 words or less. Do not post copyrighted material. Comments will not be added to stories that are over 30 days old.

(7) No posts may advertise a commercial business or political group, or link to another commercial web site or political site of any kind.