House Speaker Backs Tougher Texting While Driving Law

December 7, 2017

Texting while driving would become a “primary” traffic offense under legislation backed by House Speaker Richard Corcoran.

The legislation, expected to be unveiled Wednesday, would allow law-enforcement officers to pull over motorists if they see them texting or emailing. Currently, texting while driving is a secondary offense, meaning officers can only charge motorists with texting violations during traffic stops for other offenses, such as speeding.

Corcoran said in an interview Tuesday that as the father of six children, including two teens who have driver licenses, he has become convinced by statistics showing the dangers of texting while driving, particularly for younger drivers.

“The statistics have just become overwhelming. This has reached a national crisis,” Corcoran, R-Land O’ Lakes, said.

The state Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles reported nearly 50,000 distracted driving crashes in Florida in 2016, including 233 deaths.

“You see the under-30 population are the greatest violators of engaging in texting and driving behavior,” Corcoran said. “All of us have driven down the road and looked over to the car next to us and watched them fully engaged in email or texting. It has reached an epidemic.”

Corcoran’s support is significant because it makes the legislation much more viable during the upcoming 2018 session, after similar proposals failed to make it through the Legislature in past sessions.

The new House bill will be a variation of legislation already filed in the House (HB 121) by Rep. Emily Slosberg, D-Boca Raton, and a Senate measure (SB 90), sponsored by Sen. Keith Perry, R-Gainesville.

Corcoran said the new bill will be co-sponsored by Slosberg, who was injured in a 1996 crash that killed her twin sister along with four other teenagers, and Rep. Jackie Toledo, R-Tampa. Slosberg’s father, former Rep. Irv Slosberg, D-Boca Raton, led an effort to make violations of the state seat-belt law a primary traffic violation.

While making it easier for law enforcement officers to pull over motorists for texting, Corcoran said the bill would still protect “civil liberties.”

Motorists would not have to turn over their phones until warrants are issued. And motorists could not be detained while authorities seek warrants.

Officers would “have to witness the event, issue the ticket, and then that person is entitled to their day in court,” Corcoran said.

Asked about an American Civil Liberties Union study this year that found African-Americans were nearly twice as likely as whites to be stopped for seat-belt violations, based on 2014 data, Corcoran said those concerns will be considered as the texting legislation is debated.

But he also noted state law already has prohibitions against racial profiling to try to protect minority motorists.

Under the texting-while-driving bill, first-time violators would face a $30 fine plus court costs for a non-moving violation. Second-time offenders would face a $60 fine plus court costs with a moving violation.

The bill would include additional penalties for texting violations for motorists involved in crashes and while driving through school zones, Corcoran said.

“Really what is at issue is trying to keep our families as safe as possible on the road,” Corcoran said.

At least 39 states make texting while driving a primary traffic offense.

by Lloyd Dunkelberger, The News Service of Florida


5 Responses to “House Speaker Backs Tougher Texting While Driving Law”

  1. Invader on December 8th, 2017 7:49 am

    If smart phone mfg’s would tie talk/text into the GPS you couldn’t t/regent it serve you we’re moving

  2. John on December 8th, 2017 6:27 am

    The way law enforcement can tell the difference is if your phone is in portrait mode and you’re pushing buttons your most likely making a call, if it is in landscape mode and pushing buttons it is texting. Most of the time that is there may be a few exceptions.

  3. Patriot on December 7th, 2017 8:34 pm

    How does the law enforcement officer tell the difference between “texting” and dialing a phone number? The law is unenforceable now, and will remain so.

  4. Willy on December 7th, 2017 5:01 pm

    Here we go putting stiffer penalties on a law that’s not enforced. LEO’s don’t have the time to fight this kind of petty crap. You could make it an automatic two year revocation of your license and not make any difference in how many people text while driving because they just don’t care. Minorities more likely to get cited for seat belts a racial issue? Bah, maybe they should participate in the seat belt wearing phenomenon and they won’t get a ticket? Imagine that, obey the rules, act like a decent human being and you might be surprised how nice an officer is to you!

  5. A alex on December 7th, 2017 10:20 am

    No handheld device at all.

Have a comment on this story?

We welcome your comments on this story, but there are some rules to follow::

(1) Be Nice. No comments that slander another, no racism, no sexism, no personal attacks.

(2) No Harrassing Comments. If someone says something bad about you, don't respond. That's childish.

(3) No Libel. That's saying something is not true about someone. Don't do it.

(4) Keep it clean. Nothing vulgar, obscene or sexually related. No profanity or obvious substitutions. Period.

(5) reserves the right to remove any comments that violate our rules or we think to be inappropriate. We are not responsible for what is posted. Comments may not appear right away until they are approved by a moderator.

(6) Limit your comments to the subject in this story only, and limit comments to 300 words or less. Do not post copyrighted material. Comments will not be added to stories that are over 30 days old.

(7) No posts may advertise a commercial business or political group, or link to another commercial web site or political site of any kind.