Florida Senators Back School Safety Plan

February 27, 2018

The emotionally raw conversation about guns escalated Monday in the Capitol, as a group of gun-control advocates flailed a key Senate panel considering legislation that students, parents and educators angrily argued would do little to make Florida’s schools safer because it does not include a ban on assault-style weapons.

The intense debate came during a Senate Rules Committee hearing on a broad package addressing school safety, guns and mental health, in response to this month’s massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland that left 17 people, including 14 students, dead.

More than 1,000 people, many of them wearing “Rally in Tally” neon orange T-shirts emblazoned with #GunReformNow, traveled by bus to Tallahassee to rally and meet with lawmakers before attending the Rules Committee meeting, where the outspoken and frustrated crowd berated members of the panel.

The sea of orange confronted senators during a discussion of an amendment, sponsored by Sen. Jose Javier Rodriguez, that would ban more than a dozen types of semi-automatic, assault-style weapons like the one used by 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz to mow down students and teachers at the Broward County school.

In the days following the Valentine’s Day mass shooting, many students from the Broward County school have pleaded with lawmakers — and President Donald Trump and Gov. Rick Scott — for the prohibition on assault-style weapons, an idea opposed by the powerful National Rifle Association and many leaders of the Republican-controlled Legislature.

“Assault weapons are weapons of war. They’re designed for the battlefield and then modified for civilian use … to efficiently extinguish human life,” Rodriguez, a Miami Democrat who is running for Congress, said.

But Marion Hammer, the NRA’s Florida lobbyist, argued Rodriguez’s proposed amendment would stop just “short of banning practically every gun known to man.”

Eric Friday, general counsel for the gun-rights group Florida Carry, likened the weapons targeted in Rodriguez’s amendment to the “equivalent of the same hunting rifle my father and grandfather used.”

The comments of the gun-rights proponents elicited jeers and hisses from the overflow crowd and drew a rebuke from two 15-year-old survivors of the catastrophic event.

“I don’t understand how you can find the hobby of murdering animals the same importance as the murdering of my classmates and teachers,” Bela Urbina said. “This weapon has killed so many people. It is a militarized weapon that we don’t need. We don’t need civilians to have it.”

Her friend Katherine Guerra was even more pointed.

“Do you think that your sport is more important than human lives? And if you believe that, you need to reassess yourselves,” she said.

The raucous crowd erupted in applause for the girls, wearing their school colors of burgundy and silver.

Dozens of speakers lined up to weigh in on the proposal. Nearly all of them spoke heatedly in favor of the ban.

“Shame on all of you,” Andy Oliver, a Methodist pastor from St. Petersburg, angrily scolded lawmakers for failing to enact stricter gun laws in the wake of previous mass shootings, including the 2016 murders of 49 clubgoers at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando. “The blood is on your hands.”

The amendment failed in a 7-6 vote, with Miami Republican Anitere Flores crossing party lines to join Democrats, who voted as a bloc in favor of the proposed ban on assault-style weapons.

After the ban failed, the crowd again erupted, threatening lawmakers with being voted out of office in November.

The overall package approved by the Rules Committee would allow specially trained teachers to bring guns to schools, prohibit people younger than 21 from buying rifles or other long guns, and give law enforcement officers the ability to get court orders to take guns away from mentally ill people they deem dangerous.

Parkland Mayor Christine Hunschofsky read notes of support for the bill, even without the prohibition on assault weapons, from the parents of two students who were killed. Fred Guttenberg, whose 14-year-old daughter Jamie was slain, called the proposal a “minimally acceptable first step.”

Hunschofsky said her community is “still grieving and mourning” the event that rocked the tight-knit enclave in northern Broward County.

“Everybody knew somebody who was affected,” the mayor said. “It’s a very difficult time for all of us.”

Hunschofsky said the bill isn’t perfect but she supports the measure.

“My friends who just buried their children, they want action,” she said. “I remind everybody, three weeks ago, I don’t think anyone in the state of Florida would have thought we would ever be discussing a bill like this. So I appreciate any step in the right direction.”

The mayor said she was “not a fan” of a controversial element in the bill that would allow teachers who receive special training and are deputized by the local sheriff to serve as school “marshals.” School districts could choose whether they want to participate in the program.

The school marshal program, not included in a similar package being pushed by Scott, would require trained teachers to be “distinctly and visually identifiable to responding law enforcement officers, faculty, staff, and students, in the case of any active assailant incident on a sponsoring school district’s campus.”

But Rodriguez asked if such an identification program would potentially make teachers “become targets of mass shooters rather than individuals who are presumably helping defend us.”

Sen. Bill Galvano, a Bradenton Republican who is sponsoring the $400 million package, said it would be up to local law enforcement “to make sure they know who these participants are and how to identify them.”

Senate Minority Leader Oscar Braynon, who is black, said he fears that arming teachers could have disastrous consequences, especially for minority children.

Braynon, D-Miami Gardens, said he was unable to vote for a bill that “puts children that look like me, look like my child, in harm’s way.”

“I just cannot do it,” Braynon said.

Before the committee signed off on the sweeping measure (SB 7026) in a 9-4 vote, Galvano noted that lawmakers are hurriedly acting to respond to the catastrophe with the goal of preventing others.

And Galvano acknowledged the topic of guns evokes passion, as it did during Monday’s 3 ½-hour meeting. He praised the Legislature for being willing to “revisit” gun regulations.

“That’s not been a debate that this Legislature has ever meaningfully had since I’ve been elected,” the Bradenton Republican, who’s served in the Legislature for more than 14 years, said. “There’s still work to do, but I ask you to join me in supporting this major step in moving this to the next committee so that we never have to endure a tragedy like we have recently endured again.”

After the meeting, Hammer told The News Service of Florida the NRA does not support the measure.

“The bill contains gratuitous gun control language that will not save kids. We support hardening the schools. We support keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally ill. We support putting armed security in the schools. We do not support taking away Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens because a mentally ill young man who should have been stopped numerous times by the system wasn’t stopped, and gun owners are being blamed,” she said.

The bill is expected to go Tuesday to the Senate Appropriations Committee. Also, the House Appropriations Committee is scheduled to take up the House version of the bill Tuesday.

by The News Service of Florida


6 Responses to “Florida Senators Back School Safety Plan”

  1. Invader#61 on February 28th, 2018 8:06 pm

    Over 10,000 alcohol related deaths in vehicles last year. Do a survey on how many responsible citizens own so called assault type weapons that are not shooting anyone vs. how many irresponsible people are. If I stab anyone with my pocket knife it then becomes an assault weapon. How about the old M-1 Grand. Do you consider it an assault weapon. Every year modern improvement make vehicles change shapes and designs. Even your hunting rifles are improved over previous models.

  2. k on February 28th, 2018 3:32 pm

    When a school shooting happens, we are bombarded with all sorts of rhetoric about how bad guns are.

    but yet not one person in power criticizes the gun-free zone which puts our students in harm’s way in the first place.

    If there is no way to verify that a gun-free zone is indeed gun-free, then there is no such thing as a gun free zone.

    It can also be said that the first time a gun-free zone was violated, all gun free zones were violated for all time, and made worthless.

    People run screaming and crying for gun control to the leaders who refuse to admit they created the horror of the gun-free zone, and our leaders try to convince us that somehow leaving ourselves *less* protected against a threat the government cannot fix is a good idea.

    So in the end we will be less protected from any threat, either a lawbreaker with a gun or the government itself, because we somehow bought into the complete lie that a gun-free zone without a means to verify it was a good idea.

    I mean, you don’t hear about shootings at courthouses… where they have metal detectors and guards…

  3. No Excuses on February 27th, 2018 6:46 pm

    Well said Tabby. I totally agree, and most of these gun control liberals think that the law abiding citizens who own these weapons aren’t capable of coherent thought. I don’t hunt, but I do have the constitutional right to defend myself and my property from criminals AND from government tyranny. That alone is a reason to have an AR 15 that fires NATO rounds.

  4. Grand Locust on February 27th, 2018 1:02 pm

    Look if a person wants to have all the legal weapons today in their home, a big thumbs up. Keep em. However, when I transfer my oversized RV, I need to go online and get a transport permit. The supreme Court has affirmed the RIGHT of folks to keep pistols and rifles in their homes. Yet, our use of public roads is a privilege and there is an absolute right of congress to regulate transport of guns pursuant to the clear Supreme Court decisions in the last ten years. Got a conceal and carry you are exempt from needing a permit to transfer your gun from one location to another. Any other gun needs a permit, and like my RV needing red safety flags, an oversize banner on the back and special lighting with some states requiring an escort car., a gun will require a locked gun case with a permit to transport the same in a vehicle. A simple smart phone app like UBER will take the foid number, route, time and day, and purpose. The smart phone will have a permit issued unless the person is on a watch list. All others will have a permit on their phone in less than a minute. Just like my paperless and immediate rental agreement being transferred to my phone, I can show an officeer my rental agreement or gun transport permit. Mandatory and immediate jail sentences once a preliminary hearing determines if driving without a permit was a good faith mistake or a crime. 90 people are dying a day from guns. All these measures will do is lower the number of death by gun, it will no more insure safety than the armed law enforcement who have failed to do the same since Columbine.

  5. David Lamb on February 27th, 2018 11:35 am

    Surely you know that there are laws on the books that ban many things that disrupt society. Here are a few
    it is against the law to DUI, yet so many do. I would guess that any one that drinks,has had too much at one time or other but still drove.
    It is illegal to do drugs too but how many ignore that ordinance
    How about texting and driving…How many times have you seen people still doing that
    Same will happen with banning an”assault weapon lookalike”
    So many security measures could been taken at these schools that were ruled out due to cost or other reasons.
    And how about the mental health side. The young man was disowned by his natural parents, his adoptive family had died and he was living with others that couldnt control him legally. How much harassment was he getting from classmates
    The whole system failed him too He could have been ubder some help from agencies, the school should have observed him more and there are facilities he could have been assigned to to help him

  6. Tabby on February 27th, 2018 5:05 am

    Sickening. An AR-15 isn’t an assault rifle. Even if it were, so what. Our firearm rights aren’t just for hunting. They are to protect us from government tyranny which the founders of our nation knew so well. The first thing a country turning communist will do is confiscate firearms, and for good reason. We should be able to have any weapon our government has. Their agenda is working well however. Research their urbanization plans then look at the brainwashed idiots in places like South Florida. Even here. Yuppies addicted to phones, technology, completely controlled by it and the media on it. Cause Google said…….

Have a comment on this story?

We welcome your comments on this story, but there are some rules to follow::

(1) Be Nice. No comments that slander another, no racism, no sexism, no personal attacks.

(2) No Harrassing Comments. If someone says something bad about you, don't respond. That's childish.

(3) No Libel. That's saying something is not true about someone. Don't do it.

(4) Keep it clean. Nothing vulgar, obscene or sexually related. No profanity or obvious substitutions. Period.

(5) NorthEscambia.com reserves the right to remove any comments that violate our rules or we think to be inappropriate. We are not responsible for what is posted. Comments may not appear right away until they are approved by a moderator.

(6) Limit your comments to the subject in this story only, and limit comments to 300 words or less. Do not post copyrighted material. Comments will not be added to stories that are over 30 days old.

(7) No posts may advertise a commercial business or political group, or link to another commercial web site or political site of any kind.