State Board Of Education Members Push For Higher Standards

September 27, 2015

State Board of Education members are pushing for Florida officials to use the transition to a new standardized test as an opportunity to boost how well public school students have to do on the exam to be judged “proficient.”

Several members used their comments at a board meeting on Monday to urge Education Commissioner Pam Stewart to recommend more stringent “cut scores” to the board in the coming weeks. The new scores will be set as part of the state’s move to the Florida Standards Assessment, or FSA.

“The FSA test score is the only objective piece of information the state provides to parents about how their individual child is doing,” said Gary Chartrand, a member of the board and a recent chairman. “Some states, like Massachusetts, New York or Wisconsin have little or no gap between their state results and their national test results. Florida should move in this direction.”

The cut scores are the latest controversy to emerge over the FSA, which was dogged by a botched rollout earlier this year. Technical problems, including a cyberattack, caused widespread delays on an online portion of the test in March.

An independent report commissioned by the Legislature recently said the test was valid for use to evaluate teachers and grade schools, but cautioned against weighing it too heavily in making decisions about whether students can graduate or be promoted from grade to grade.

While Florida has often been viewed as a laboratory for school reform, some groups have taken aim at how the state’s standards on test scores compare to national exams like the National Assessment of Educational Progress. In a report issued last year and based on 2011 data, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation gave the state a “C” in what the group called “truth in advertising.”

A more recent report by Achieve, a national nonpartisan group that calls for higher standards, found that there was a 16- to 20-point gap between how many Florida students were found proficient on the national tests in 2013 and the state’s former standardized test that year.

Michael Olenick, another member of the Florida education board, tied the push for higher scores to Gov. Rick Scott’s focus on the economy.

“But the reality is, without great education reform, we’ll never have great economic reform,” he said.

The board will ultimately decide what to do with the cut scores after receiving Stewart’s recommendations, which will also be reviewed by the Legislature. But John Padget, vice chairman of the board, indicated there was “a huge gap” between what board members wanted and what technical committees advising Stewart on cut scores were recommending.

“I’m just expressing my frustration that the process has left us and left you in an awkward position,” Padget said.

by Brandon Larrabee, The News Service of Florida

Comments

One Response to “State Board Of Education Members Push For Higher Standards”

  1. Bonnie Exner on September 30th, 2015 12:04 am

    Let me understand this..the scores are VALID enough for teacher evaluations and school rankings but NOT VALID for student promotions..does ANYONE see the double standard here besides me????





Have a comment on this story?

We welcome your comments on this story, but there are some rules to follow::

(1) Be Nice. No comments that slander another, no racism, no sexism, no personal attacks.

(2) No Harrassing Comments. If someone says something bad about you, don't respond. That's childish.

(3) No Libel. That's saying something is not true about someone. Don't do it.

(4) Keep it clean. Nothing vulgar, obscene or sexually related. No profanity or obvious substitutions. Period.

(5) NorthEscambia.com reserves the right to remove any comments that violate our rules or we think to be inappropriate. We are not responsible for what is posted. Comments may not appear right away until they are approved by a moderator.

(6) Limit your comments to the subject in this story only, and limit comments to 300 words or less. Do not post copyrighted material. Comments will not be added to stories that are over 30 days old.

(7) No posts may advertise a commercial business or political group, or link to another commercial web site or political site of any kind.