Lawsuit Aims To Halt Return Of Bear Hunting

August 3, 2015

Conservation groups want a judge to shoot down the return of bear hunting in Florida and to halt the pending sale of bear-hunting permits.

With permits for this fall’s hunt going on sale Monday, the Seminole County-based group Speak Up Wekiva filed a lawsuit in Leon County circuit court Friday challenging the constitutionality of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission-approved bear hunt.

“There is no evidence to support the supposition that hunting bears in remote wildlife management areas will reduce conflicts in suburbia,” the lawsuit contends.

Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission spokeswoman Susan Smith defended the commission’s ability to approve rule changes. However, she said the agency had yet to receive a copy of the lawsuit and doesn’t discuss the merits of pending litigation.

“I can say the commission validly adopted rules allowing for a limited bear hunt based on sound reasoning and with careful consideration of the issues involved,” Smith said.

The lawsuit doesn’t ask for a judge to halt the commission from offering the permits. However, Speak Up Wekiva and groups supporting the lawsuit — the Sierra Club, the Massachusetts-based Environmental Action, the League of Women Voters of Florida and the Center for Biological Diversity — want the state agency to suspend permitting until the lawsuit is settled.

“If they do sell the permits, and the hunt is ruled unconstitutional, they’ll have to pay everyone back, and that could be very time-consuming,” said Chuck O’Neal, a Longwood resident and member of Speak Up Wekiva whose name also appears on the lawsuit.

Smith said permitting remains on schedule to begin Monday.

Supporters of bear hunting derided the lawsuit as hindering efforts to reduce human-bear conflicts.

“The FWC is a constitutional body charged with ‘managing fish and wildlife resources for their long-term well-being and the benefit of people,’ “National Rifle Association lobbyist Marion Hammer said in an email Friday. “Political organizations that try to second guess the professionalism of the commission and the agency are interlopers who obviously put bears before the safety and lives of children.”

Opponents of the hunt have argued that Florida’s increased human population is expanding into wildlife habitat and that the state should further implement non-lethal rules, such as bear-proofing trash containers, prohibiting people from feeding wild bears and cracking down on the illegal harvesting of saw palmetto berries, which is a staple of a bear’s diet.

On Friday, those opponents pointed to ongoing efforts by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to get a better count of black bears in areas where the hunt will occur and said that opposition to the hunt stood around 75 percent during the public debate on the proposal.

“We welcome today’s lawsuit challenging the wildlife commission’s unconstitutional, unnecessary, and immoral black bear hunt,” the Sierra Club’s Florida Staff Director Frank Jackalone said in a release. “The commission must suspend the hunt immediately and work with scientists to protect Florida’s black bears, not kill them.”

The lawsuit contends the rules for the hunt go against the 1998 voter-approved constitutional amendment that created the commission as an independent body “to conduct management, preservation and conservation decision-making based upon sound science.” The complaint also claims the bear hunt is not based upon sound science and won’t reduce growing conflicts between bears and humans.

“The FWC is acting against the interests of Floridians, science, and Florida black bears,” said lawsuit supporter Jaclyn Lopez, Florida director for the Center for Biological Diversity. “It is not too late for it to hit the brakes on this ill-conceived plan.”

The hunt is scheduled to begin Oct. 24 and will last from two to seven days, depending upon the number of bears killed.

The commission approved the hunt in June as a step in managing the growing bear population in Florida.

The state agency expects about 300 bears to be killed in the four regions of the state where hunting will be allowed. The state isn’t putting a limit on the number of special-use bear permits being sold, but hunters will be limited to killing a single bear during the week.

The cost for a permit is $100 for Florida residents and $300 for non-residents. The permits will be available through 11:59 p.m. on Oct. 23. People who purchased a Lifetime License prior to July 1, 1998 — when those licenses still covered bear hunting — must still obtain one of the new permits, but are exempt from the cost.

Black bears were placed on the state’s threatened list in 1974, when there were between 300 and 500 across Florida. At the time, hunting black bears was limited to three counties. In 1994, the hunting season was closed statewide.

The bears were taken off the list in 2012.

Florida now has an estimated 3,150 black bears in four regions — the eastern Panhandle, Northeast Florida, east-central Florida and South Florida — where the hunts are planned. The numbers are based on 2002 estimates for the eastern Panhandle and South Florida and a 2014 count in the Northeast Florida and east-central Florida regions.

The hunt will be halted in each region — the FWC intends to communicate daily with hunters via text and email — once quotas for the areas are reached.

by Jim Turner, The News Service of Florida


9 Responses to “Lawsuit Aims To Halt Return Of Bear Hunting”

  1. chris in Molino on August 6th, 2015 3:47 am

    Sorry i didn’t see this earlier, although i’m certain i’d hear silence anyway.
    All time high huh ? Wow, roughly 116,000 black bears east of the Mississippi River. In comparison to 415,000 west of it (not including Wyoming) which eould add at least another 10-20,000.
    Going solely by, LA,MS,AL,FL,GA and SC, there are roughly 10,130 black bears. That’s not even 10% of whats west of Mississippi River so as a hunter who would love to have the variety of bear meat, no hunt should be warranted at this time.
    All time high, ha !

  2. haley on August 4th, 2015 8:04 am

    I find it ironic how the ppl who are in favor of this bear hunt can always find an excuse as to why it helps the bear population if we kill a few. That’s how they become extinct. Let’s go out and kill a few hundred/thin them out until they become on the endangered list again. Just like the deer. Guess I am too much an animal advocate. But, I think this bear hunt is terrible.

  3. Jim on August 3rd, 2015 10:05 pm

    @Kathy – Black Bear populations all along the Eastern US, from Florida to Maine, are at all-time highs. Not sure where your info comes from.
    Hunting actually helps keep populations healthy, which in the long run, ensures maintaining population numbers.

  4. chris in Molino on August 3rd, 2015 8:48 pm

    The law should read in favor of the bear. Since this is their habitat, and most conflicts are the fault of people (ie; leaving garbage where bears can get to it), FWC should have to investigate for conflicts or reports and cite people for attracting bears. If they were numerous (and not just in a couple small places) i’d say sure ,why not, i’m a hunter. We eat fish, crawfish, deer, and hog, all caught or killed locally. Three times a week at a minimum.
    Please don’t tell me the bird seed you put out attracted a bear. Your need to see birds (cause they ain’t gonna starve) does not outweigh the bears necessity to live. I know they cause some rukus in a few places. No doubt someone with money or bigshot at Eglin had an opinion because they or someone they know had an issue eith a bear. While plentiful in that area, they aren’t till you get near Mobile.
    Infact, the ruling goes against a stated goal of wildlife officials including FWC in a multu-state partnership as evidenced on the commission’s website under Perdido River Wma. You have to read but look it up. That’s why both sides purchased thousands of acres a piece. To have an area for the black bear to travel to and fro Lower Mississippi River Valley. So wow, funny how all this money involved in purchasing the land and its management to bring the black bear here so they populate is being crapped on to hunt it. Talk about being contradictory.

  5. Kathy on August 3rd, 2015 5:47 pm

    I have been hoping they would not allow killing Black bears, there are not many left.
    We need to protect them from all of the people who just love to shoot something!

  6. haley on August 3rd, 2015 1:46 pm

    Im so glad for this lawsuit to halt the senseless killing of these bears. We have moved into their habitat and the easiest way to solve this problem is to kill them. I don’t agree.

  7. Shelley on August 3rd, 2015 11:09 am

    Shooting an animal does not make you a stronger man. It makes you a weak man.

  8. Alex A on August 3rd, 2015 10:02 am

    Maybe the bears should be issued human permits in certain areas. LIKE THE DEEP WOODS?

  9. Eddy on August 3rd, 2015 8:38 am

    Good! Protect those beautiful creatures.

Have a comment on this story?

We welcome your comments on this story, but there are some rules to follow::

(1) Be Nice. No comments that slander another, no racism, no sexism, no personal attacks.

(2) No Harrassing Comments. If someone says something bad about you, don't respond. That's childish.

(3) No Libel. That's saying something is not true about someone. Don't do it.

(4) Keep it clean. Nothing vulgar, obscene or sexually related. No profanity or obvious substitutions. Period.

(5) reserves the right to remove any comments that violate our rules or we think to be inappropriate. We are not responsible for what is posted. Comments may not appear right away until they are approved by a moderator.

(6) Limit your comments to the subject in this story only, and limit comments to 300 words or less. Do not post copyrighted material. Comments will not be added to stories that are over 30 days old.

(7) No posts may advertise a commercial business or political group, or link to another commercial web site or political site of any kind.