Escambia Lowers OLF-8 Selling Price By $14 Million, Keeps 171 Acres For Job Creation

March 27, 2026

The Escambia County Commission voted on Thursday to revise a purchase contract for the OLF-8 property on Nine Mile Road, keeping about one-third of acreage while lowering the purchase price.

Last year, the Escambia County Commissioners approved the $42.5 million sale of 540 acres of OLF-8 to Tri-W Development and Chad C. Henderson Enterprises of Pensacola.

The county will keep about 171 acres and lower the purchase price to $28,429,000, which is a $14,071,000 reduction.

Henderson said the plan will create a partnership with the county, giving it more control of job creation in an Employment Technology Innovation (ETI) District. He said the county is in a position to secure funding, grants, or even Triumph money.

The county commissioner voted 4-0 on Thursday, with Commissioner Mike Kohler voice support, but abstained from voting due to a previous campaign contribution from developers during a fundraiser just two days before the meeting.

“It’s not about a price reduction,” Henderson said during Thursday’s commission meeting “It’s not about because we don’t want to buy the 171 acres or we bit off more than we can chew. This is about curated approach to make sure we a have the best chance to have the successful outcomes.”

Once the official purchase agreement is revised, it will return to the commission for final consideration.

Comments

17 Responses to “Escambia Lowers OLF-8 Selling Price By $14 Million, Keeps 171 Acres For Job Creation”

  1. Steve on March 30th, 2026 5:39 am

    A lot of taxpayer money being thrown around here and there and very little to show for it . For the county as a whole !

  2. Steve on March 28th, 2026 8:42 pm

    That discretionary fund is peanuts compared to the kick back the commissioners are going to get off this sale even if they give it away on books . County fails and commissioners succeed .

  3. Susie on March 28th, 2026 10:13 am

    I want to pay less too…ON MY TAXES! But there’s no negotiating that. I will say this, I will make it a point to advocate NOT to vote for ANY of these sneaky commissioners. This reminds me of years ago commissioners passing a pot of money and all the nonsense that went with it! Sickening!

  4. DD85 on March 28th, 2026 7:48 am

    What should be reviewed to make sure the revised land deal is fair and legal, is whether the new price matched the smaller amount of land sold and whether taxpayers received full value. Also, what risks does the county take on paying for infrastructure, whether the deal changed unfairly after bidding, and whether the county took on other financial risks that should have stayed with the developer. Home rule allows amending the contract but this needs to be investigated by the IG to answer these questions.

  5. Angelica on March 27th, 2026 9:33 pm

    This is not what we want in Beulah. The developer should have either paid the full price and complied with the Beulah master plan, or, the county should have cancelled the contract and gone back to allowing bids.

  6. John q on March 27th, 2026 7:33 pm

    So the the others bid on one set of conditions, now the local boys get to change the terms and cherry picker. Sounds like a lawsuit.

  7. Rodney on March 27th, 2026 3:56 pm

    It seems that most here feel this is not the best decision the county commissioners could have made and I tend to agree. The bear solution is to be educated before you vote and choose the candidate with the best ability to make decisions that benefit the citizens.

  8. David Huie Green on March 27th, 2026 12:20 pm

    “We bit off more than we can chew”

    Broken promises.
    (Just as soon as I have fifty-two million dollars to throw around — or even a mere 28.429 million — I will try to be more responsible, thoughtful, and honest
    As it is others who might have bid more for the adjusted purchase are not allowed to bid. It sounds flawed somehow.)

  9. Local on March 27th, 2026 11:51 am

    I hope the county gets the pick of the land.

  10. Robert Cash on March 27th, 2026 11:31 am

    Would be a good spot for a new Bay Center.

  11. Scott on March 27th, 2026 10:42 am

    Sounds like W.D and Willie all over again

  12. Luigi on March 27th, 2026 8:50 am

    This transaction is great material for a screenplay or a teleplay . It could be called the OLF-5 , Escambia Cosa Nostra , Gambinos investments , Political fundraiser strategies , all local writers encourage to participate . Great opportunity for nonfiction , and fiction writers .

  13. Teresa A Comparetta on March 27th, 2026 8:10 am

    You have got to be kidding. How much in the open can a person be without being under investigation. Commissioner Mike Kohler insults and made light of State Representative Michelle Salzman traumatic past experience she will never outlive. Then he “accepts monies” (presumably payoffs, my opinion) two days prior during a fundraiser. Well…That is transparency. Do it in the open. My opinion

  14. rd on March 27th, 2026 8:00 am

    orignal price: $78,703/acre.
    new price: $77,043/acre.
    If you are keeping the property abutting 9-mile road, arguably the most expensive acreage, and giving back the property in the back, the least expensive property, the price per acre should go up, not down. All they did was give back the property they don’t want to develop and were rewarded in the process.

  15. Not You on March 27th, 2026 7:49 am

    The county should place a Fire/EMS station with a helicopter landing pad on part of that 171 acres.

  16. bob c. on March 27th, 2026 6:36 am

    Here we go again…
    Has the BoCC reached the point where the cost of maintaining, marketing, planning, purchase, etc, etc, etc of OLF-8 has exceeded any hope of profit for the county?

  17. Steve on March 27th, 2026 6:12 am

    Mr Haney from Green Acres !





Have a comment on this story?

We welcome your comments on this story, but there are some rules to follow::

(1) Be Nice. No comments that slander another, no racism, no sexism, no personal attacks.

(2) No Harrassing Comments. If someone says something bad about you, don't respond. That's childish.

(3) No Libel. That's saying something is not true about someone. Don't do it.

(4) Keep it clean. Nothing vulgar, obscene or sexually related. No profanity or obvious substitutions. Period.

(5) NorthEscambia.com reserves the right to remove any comments that violate our rules or we think to be inappropriate. We are not responsible for what is posted. Comments may not appear right away until they are approved by a moderator.

(6) Limit your comments to the subject in this story only, and limit comments to 300 words or less. Do not post copyrighted material. Comments will not be added to stories that are over 30 days old.

(7) No posts may advertise a commercial business, political candidate or political group, or link to another commercial web site or political site of any kind.