Latest Headlines
- Bus, Tractor Crash Near Walnut Hill
- Reports Detail Allegations Against Century Man That Evaded Capture For Months
- Middle 80s For Friday
- Century Fails To Test Drinking Water For Cyanide, Organic Compounds For Entire Year, DEP Says
- Tate FFA Alumni Rodeo Is Friday And Saturday; Here’s How To Win Tickets (And How To Buy Online)
- Cantonment Man Charged With Punching Woman, Hitting Her With Space Heater
- ECSO Closes Down Another ‘Drug House’, Makes Arrest
- Flomaton Police Chief Submits Resignation
- Wine Homers As Tate Beats Milton 6-3 In District Semi-Finals
- Spohn Stars as Wahoos Win Another Extra-Inning Thriller
U.S. Marshals Arrest Sex Offender On Federal Charges
April 29, 2011
An Escambia County man was arrested Thursday by the U.S. Marshals on a federal sex offense warrant.
Thomas John Bach, 52, was arrested by members of the U.S. Marshals Florida Regional Task Force and the Escambia and Santa Rosa County Sheriff’s Offices. He was arrested on a federal warrant for failing to register as a sex offender.
Bach was indicted in federal court under the 2006 Adam Walsh Act which allows the federal government to prosecute those who leave one state and fail to register in another.
Bach allegedly had been traveling throughout the U.S. and possibly abroad the past several years never registering.
U.S. Marshals finally caught up with Bach today at the Gulf Power Crist Plant in Escambia Countyand arrested him without incident. Bach was booked into the Escambia Count Jail without bond.
Comments
9 Responses to “U.S. Marshals Arrest Sex Offender On Federal Charges”
The National registry says he did register in 1998 ???? Registry mandatory in 2006????? He is listed with a Floirda statue number for a crime in Pennsylvania? Bucks county Penn public records, no mention of sexual assault? “Travelling”???? for work returning home after each job, permanent address in Milton? Several traffic tickets since list his address at Milton?
Just for the record I have run accross this person in my own travels.
Who? What? When? Where?
Too many loose ends here.
REGARDING:
“But if he was overseas for years and came back, and then moved around, how can he be held responsible for something he wasn’t aware of?”
Despite the claim “ignorance of the law is no excuse,” most juries would take it into account. Nonetheless, he’d have to convince a jury he was ignorant of the law. Even if you did, at best he’d just be judicially innocent rather than factually innocent. The only way he would be factually innocent would be if he didn’t change states since before the law went into effect.
And that doesn’t matter, anyway, you claimed the law didn’t apply to him because his crime predated the law, but it doesn’t because his crime is not registering. The case you cited makes that clear.
David considering crime and punishment
But if he was overseas for years and came back, and then moved around, how can he be held responsible for something he wasn’t aware of? Its different if he signs a paper or statement agreeing, but otherwise not. Considering how long ago his offense happened though it must have been a bad one, I would think he would be released by this time if it had been consensual. So maybe thats the reason
REGARDING:
“Just saying if he did it before the law took effect they how can they hold him accountable?”
It’s an interesting question. But let’s look at the wording of the very case Huh cited:
“ Holding: The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, a 2007 law that requires sex offenders to register, does not apply to sex offenders whose interstate travel occurred before the Act went into effect..”
So they say the law does not apply to TRAVEL which occurred before the Act went into effect. They agreed the law DOES apply to travel which occurred AFTER the Act went into effect in 2007.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1301.pdf
So if the fellow moved across state lines in the past four years, he violated the law for which he was arrested and the US Marshals aren‘t stupid after all.
David considering the law in question
As much as I dislike a sex offender I think this one will be won by the offender. The law as sited by huh will win it for him. Just saying if he did it before the law took effect they how can they hold him accountable?
Just sounds like a good scam to me. He is a convicted sex offender and
then he traveals all over the U.S. and Abroad so he doesn’t ever have
to register. Sorry, It makes me wonder how many others he hurt and
then left those towns and just never got caught. Maybe they never knew
he was even IN TOWN. If the Federal Marshalls still thought this guy
should be picked up, I wonder if they suspect him of more crimes.
looks like 1983 was his crime time, or at least sentence time, so maybe this doesn’t apply, unless he violated some probation or something.
let’s see, he’s 52, it was 27 years ago in Pennsylvanias would have made him 25 at the time.
It just seems unlikely federal marshals and federal judges wouldn’t know the applicable law.
David for non sex offenders
“In Carr v. United States (08-1301), the Court, on a 6-3 vote, reverses and remands in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor. Justice Scalia concurs in part and in the judgment, but joins most of Justice Sotomayor’s opinion. Justice Alito dissents, joined by Justices Thomas and Ginsburg.
* Holding: The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, a 2007 law that requires sex offenders to register, does not apply to sex offenders whose interstate travel occurred before the Act went into effect.”
He might win this case, if he was punished before the Adam Walsh act went into effect in 2006, then it can be listed as ex post facto. A similar case was won recently regarding this.
How can this man legally be held to something he was not aware of , that was passed far after his punishment was enacted? He needs to lawyer up