Comments on: Tens of Thousands In Stolen Property Recovered After Search Warrant In Cantonment

By: Pensacola Bob

Pensacola Bob — Mon, 08 Dec 2025 00:19:23 +0000

So…apparently this guy was already on probation from some federal offense, WHICH HE VIOLATED according to the cops. And now apparently…(ahem)…allegedly…they’ve discovered a BUNCH of stuff on his property that was reported stolen. What a guy! Real solid citizen, eh?

I’ve noticed that there is usually a reason why some people live way off the beaten path, down a dirt road: It’s more than just a need for privacy, which we could understand. “Some people” like to keep away from the prying eyes of law enforcement. The joke’s on them! Nowadays, with drones being as plentiful as they are, you cannot hide from the cops. The ECSO guys probably knew exactly what they would find *before* setting foot on his property.

People who steal stuff from other people are despicable…the lowest of the low. I sincerely hope that Mr. Odom gets what he deserves…whatever that is. And any of his neighbors who might also be in the same industry as Odom…well…they better be forewarned: You can’t hide your stolen stuff anymore.

By: Farm Hill

Farm Hill — Sun, 07 Dec 2025 12:55:59 +0000

Mr. Romagnano, society does not bear responsibility for an individual committing crime of any sort. This type of thinking dismisses personal accountability for one’s own choices. It turns the victims into criminals and it turns the real criminals into victims.If this defendant is found guilty, the punishment he receives should not be concerned with societal factors or his upbringing. True justice means means the victims property should be restored by the defendant or properly compensated. Also the perpetrator should be given a sentence that will deter him from committing the same crime in the future.

By: C. Anderson Romagnano

C. Anderson Romagnano — Sat, 06 Dec 2025 20:32:07 +0000

Now we have someone, who will have a trial. They are presumed innocent and a pre-trial detainee at this time. I see a 47 year old. Now if they are guilty and are convicted, they will serve a sentence.

But the question is, as a matter of recidivism. Was it a first time offense, or is there a long list of prior offenses? And then the question becomes, if there are so many past convictions, why the re-offense.

Or the question, and I will make a presumption here but, is this someone who has been given a chance to work after a first sentence, etc, or is it that “record of criminal convictions means no hire” which becomes a sort of self-defeating thing.

We have to get smart on corrections, at some point they are released, and they have to be able to function in society, work a job, etc.

It should not be a situation of “first time offense” means “never much real employment and a constant life of crime.” That this is the case is a key part of the recidivism problem and is a failure on society’s part. We all should work. We all should contribute.