Latest Headlines
- ‘It’s A Blessing’ – Volunteers Build Wheelchair Ramp For Molino Veteran
- Cantonment Man Charged With Stealing Metal From Church During Service Hours
- Undocumented Farm Worker, 45, Gets 25 Years For Attempted Sexual Battery Of 11-Year Old In Walnut Hill
- Bratt, Byrneville Elementary Students Create Winning EREC Meeting Promo Posters
- Make-A-Wish Grants Wish For Girl, 4, With A Barbie Camper
- Fields Of Faith: Community Worship Service Held At Northview High
- Missing Child Alert Issued For Alabama Teen
- 63 New Members Inducted Into Northview High Beta Club
- Blue Wahoos School Shuckers On Education Day
- 2-Month-Old Passes Away Following Escambia County Wreck
Escambia School Board Rejects Return To An Elected Superintendent
March 22, 2023
The Escambia County School board voted down a proposal to return to an elected superintendent during a Tuesday night meeting.
Board member Kevin Adams brought forward a resolution to officially request a referendum to switch superintendent back to an elected job. The Escambia County Commission would then would have considered a resolution asking the legislature to place the question on the ballot during the presidential preference primary on March 19, 2024.
Adams and board member Paul Fetsko voted in favor of putting the elected superintendent back on the ballot for voters, while Patty Hightower, Bill Slayton and David Williams voted against.
In 2018, Escambia County voters narrowly approved a ballot referendum for an appointed superintendent, with 50.36 voting yes and 49.64 percent voting now. This was the sixth time voters had considered the idea of an appointed superintendent in the county; all of the other attempts failed.
The term of then superintendent Malcolm Thomas ended in 2020, and Dr. Tim Smith was appointed as the new school district boss.
Comments
26 Responses to “Escambia School Board Rejects Return To An Elected Superintendent”
@What, you do realize that the majority of registered voters in the U.S. are democrats, right?
Pretty easy for Slayton to win over and over when he runs as the only candidate time after time. Term limits would be nice but the sitting members will never vote for it. Of course Tim Smith says appointed is the way to go……….I mean let’s go for the obvious self-preservation on this folks. Voters have the power as long as the election isn’t rigged from the start. And @Joy, where did you come up with our great governor having anything to do with this? Can you POSSIBLY substantiate that claim? Didn’t think so.
The problem is, no one heard Dr Smith until he was chosen by friends of Quint Studer. Studer was behind the campaign to choose a Superintendent.
@ Jason. I totally agree with you. VOTE NO for Bill and Patty. It’s long overdue.
Tim Smith got the position following a voter-approved referendum in 2018 to change superintendent from an elected position to an appointed one. Now you have those 3 board members to vote NO to changing it back. Get them out of office and maybe the School System will survive in the future. But don’t look for changes any time soon. Getting rid of Smith should be the first step in saving our Schools.
No one ran against Bill Slayton in 2012, 2016 or 2020. Under state law, if no one runs against an incumbent they win without their name ever being on the ballot. School board members get paid $42,000+ plus whatever medical and retirement benefits go with the job. That’s a pretty sweet deal for a part-time job. Slayton is 75. Time for new blood on the school board. How about a parent with some real kids in school?
Never ever ever give up your right to vote on anything! Only sheep give up rights.
I’m sorry but this county has a long history of very poor elected superintendents. An appointed superintendent can at least be held instantly accountable by the board. There has been a pattern of get elected by catering to the teacher’s union, exploit the “good ole boy” system, hang on four years to build up a excessive retirement then leave a financial mess to be paid by the taxpayers. Trivia: Mike Holloway was the highest paid superintendent in the State of Florida the day that he was elected even though he had no educational back ground.
at Joy…..
Governor DeSantis had nothing to do with the decision on appointed or elected Superintendent. The voters in Escambia County passed the measure to approve an appointed Superintendent on 11/16/18, by a slim .36% percentage equating to 910 votes. IMHO, it was and remains a horrible decision.
Apparently the School Board knows that an appointed superintendent hasnt fulfilled the role as expected, or they wouldnt have an issue allowing AN INFORMED VOTER to vote on the measure again. Regardless, the Governor had no nothing to do with the measure. And besides, the Governor in office at the time of the vote in 2018 was Rick Scott. So take your hatred of Governor DeSantis elsewhere.
Mr.Slayton has done nothing to improve the schools. The questions put forward for the hunt for the Superintendent showed they were looking for someone ‘woke’ anyway. Malcolm Thomas was elected but a loser, as well.
REMEMBER who your School Board member is and how they voted against Elected Superintendent…AND VOTE THEM OUT!!! GOOD BYE Patty Hightower. Bill Slayton….I’ve known you since the 80’s and I’m REALLY surprised at how you’ve turned out!!!
@ Joy, don’t think the governor had anything to do with this, it was voted for by the citizens of Escambia County.
@Jason I agree 100%
My votes will be for new board members next election!
NO VOTE -NO RIGHTS!
ONCE A VOTING RIGHT IS GIVEN UP IS HARD TO GET BACK .NOW IT MUST BE DONE THROUGH NEW SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS !!
The libs have infiltrated our county.
This issue was decided when the citizens voted to have this an appointed position in 2018.
The population in the failing school districts carry the majority of the responibility for their schools receiving a failing grade. I don’t care who the superintendent is, they cannot make positive changes if the parents of the children in these districts couldn’t care less about education or the rule of law.
Ignorance breeds ignorance. Until the parents in these areas decide to become productive responsible citizens and involve themselves in the education of their children, there will be little if any change.
There Bill goes again…Bill Slayton.Attempts to portray himself as a local North Escambian who aligns with our values, but is really beholden to the “Downtown Crowd” political structure.
@Joy; I think you are totally confused about this issue. Our Governor had absolutely nothing to do with the decision to go to an appointed Superintendent of Schools in Escambia County. This issue was brought forward by the sitting School Board, and the County Commission approved putting it on the ballot. The voters narrowly approved enacting this change. You are correct that this move was designed to dilute the power parents, voters, and tax payers have to oversee the operation of the schools, and if you bother to check, you will find that the teachers unions are pushing this change all over the country.
There is a difference between guide and control.. It’s obvious there are 3 that want control over anything else. Our elected leaders are elected because guidance is needed in such matters. Thoughtful guidance is acquired through the input of those who put them there. Control is acquired through your own self-centered little world of thoughts and actions. Guidance Counselors anyone? Not control counselors. Karma is coming to those who abide by their own agenda and it can’t be soon enough.
of course it should remain an elected office-but the governor you put back in-wants it all to come from Tallahassee–and where is the uproar the parents should be displaying—keep letting little things like this and you will have NO RIGHTS
That’s why we need new School board members.
That is sad we get stuck with someone who does not care for our kids just a job.
That’s OK Mr. Slayton.
I do get to vote against you.
elected or appointed ; the taxpayers see failure from these people running the Escambia County School System .
Bill Slayton and Patty Hightower have continued to vote against the best interest of the taxpayers. This is just another example of how they are out of touch with those who pay for the operations of the school district.
If you cant cats a vote for the Superintendent, then be sure to VOTE NO for Bill Slayton and Patty Hightower. They raised your taxes during the pandemic for what amounted to was a “just because we can” mentality and tonight they once again voted to save the job of an “Appointed Superintendent”. IMHO, Its time for Bill Slayton and Patty Hightower to leave public office.