There is a lesson here, in don’t murder and kill, avoid the unpleasantries of incarceration and death by execution. Save your family and the families of other’s anguish, despair, heartbreak.

Nathaniel was indeed a sacred gift from God when he was in his mother’s womb. But then Nathaniel made the conscience decision to participate in the cold-blooded murder of three police officers and the attempted murder of another. While he may not have pulled the trigger, he was just as guilty as the man who did. In the sixteen years since, his case has been reviewed by at least nine different courts. I’m sure that Jeffery Dahmer, Ted Bundy, Adolf Hitler, and John Wayne Gacy were all considered “sacred gifts from God” when they were born as well, but yet they chose to do such heinous acts within their lives that forfeited their right to live. As did Nathaniel Woods. So please spare me the moral lecture on how one cannot possibly be pro-life and pro-death penalty. If you honestly cannot see the difference in slaughtering an innocent baby and executing a cold-blooded murderer, then I don’t know how to explain the difference to you. And, yes, I will remember Kay Ivey in the next election. She’s certainly got my vote!

I’ll give you the reason that “pro-life” can be ok with the death penalty for murder. It’s because unborn babies are INNOCENT and the convicted murderer is GUILTY. That’s the simple reason. GUILTY vs INNOCENT.

This man choose to involve himself in murder of police officers. Therefore he was lawfully convicted of this crime. Every conviction of murder should result in a death penalty execution in my opinion.

I said what I said.