Comments on: Nelson Concedes Senate Race, Scott Heads To Washington

By: David Huie Green

David Huie Green — Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:37:12 +0000

REGARDING:
“you would lose them for one term. If they were that good vote them back in.”

We tried to vote them back in but your term limitation stopped us. A bird in the hand is usually worth more than what might possibly be a bird in the bush. We shouldn’t be forced to go shake bushes and possibly wind up with a buzzard.

David for prime turkeys

By: retired

retired — Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:26:46 +0000

to David and Tom
you would lose them for one term. If they were that good vote them back in.

I would have liked scott to do another term also, he has done most everthing he set out to do. MAYBE NOW HE CAN HELP GET A FEDERAL STATUE PAST, THAT SAYS YOU HAVE TO PEE IN THE BOTTLE BEFORE YOU GET GOVERNMENT MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU HAVE TO DO IT TO GET MOST JOBS NOW.

By: Tom

Tom — Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:32:44 +0000

@ David, spoken very well. Couldn’t of said it any better myself.

By: David Huie Green

David Huie Green — Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:25:32 +0000

REGARDING:
“WORK TOWARDS TERM LIMITS FOR ALL ELECTED OFFICES”

Voting allows us to get rid of people we decide are bad for us.

Term limits forces us to lose those we otherwise like to have. What if Senator Scott does a wonderful job? Would you like to force yourself to lose him?

David for freedom of choice

By: dishearted

dishearted — Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:08:20 +0000

per: retired……AMEN, and ALL ELECTED OFFICES..they wont let this happen.

By: retired

retired — Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:42:36 +0000

NOW WE NEED TO WORK TOWARDS TERM LIMITS FOR ALL ELECTED OFFICES

By: tg

tg — Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:39:20 +0000

Well Scott gave back some of that fortune to buy a Senate seat. Only mult-Millionaires can run for office now.