Comments on: Media Groups Fight ‘Jane Doe’ Request In Gun Law Case

By: Rocky

Rocky — Sat, 06 Oct 2018 04:26:34 +0000

I really don’t understand why these news agencies would have an issue with this case proceeding with anonymous testimony. They’ve made it blatantly obvious that they don’t watch the news if they can even remotely suggest that these two individuals would not be threatened, harassed, and very likely harmed.

I mean seriously… Since the NRA suggested the anonymous testimony, we have had one Obama/Soros funded organization after another hounding them, insisting that they must stand up and be recognized, so those organizations can send their minions to harass them. Because that is the way they play the game.

The only other way to resolve this matter would be to bus every 18 – 21 year old desiring to own a gun to the trial and flood the court. But the opposition will be there protesting, to agonize all them.

What we truly need in this matter, is for our elected leaders to find the intestinal fortitude to put the people leading these problem makers behind bars for a very very long time, or exercise the death penalty for their treasonous actions against the United States of America. Then there would be no opposition to anonymous testimony in this case.

By: John R Groton

John R Groton — Sat, 06 Oct 2018 03:40:26 +0000

It seems ridiculous to assert that the Does don’t require/shouldn’t be allowed anonymity in this case. Given the current fervor in this country at present to assault any person, program, event, historical item/object that offends them via verbal, written, print, media, technology or physically it would seem prudent to grant their request for anonymity. The same authorities that deem them not mature enough to purchase a firearm at age 18 would then declare that they are mature enough to face the almost certain violent acts of the dissident factions.

If a person 18 years of age is considered mature enough to be armed and trained to kill in the armed services of this country, are they not also mature enough to purchase a firearm for recreational use? This would seem to be an illegal double standard. This another instance of elected officials using their office to force their own personal desires on the populace. They are elected to REPRESENT their constituents; not mandate unpopular laws/regulations upon those same constituents Let your voices be heard and then vote them out. Enough said.

By: jp

jp — Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:17:27 +0000

What Duns Megus said is obiously 100% correct to anyone watching events with an open mind.

To that I will add that the Main Stream Media (MSM), has in most cases shown extreme bias against President Trump, conservatives, and the Constution.

The MSM has shown that they will publish anything they can get their hands on including information that helps our countries enemys kill more of us.
Take for instance blabbing that our military was tracking and listening to enemy’s cell phones. So they just quit using cell phones to communicate.

Young adults under the age of 21 might think about joining the NRA in the fight to overturn this unconstitutional law. If enough people join in it will lesson the backlash.

We have to defend our liberties or loose them.

By: Duns Megus

Duns Megus — Thu, 04 Oct 2018 09:53:02 +0000

Who’s living in fairlyland? The behavior of the Lunatic Left is evidence enough, overabundant evidence, that Jane and John Does’ lives would be threatened and be made hell on earth.

When college students kick in University doors and riot on campus merely to protest a one-time appearance of a conservative speaker; when we hear that Kavanaugh and Ford both have had to leave their homes and hide from violently irresponsible members of rabid, mouth-foaming movements — the veracity of their need for protection is baldly evident.