Comments on: Justices Reject Challenge To Three Florida Ballot Measures

By: Jdub

Jdub — Fri, 19 Oct 2018 12:10:11 +0000

I have been complaining about these amendments since read the ballot. It is ridiculous how they have grouped these unrelated issues together. Voting NO to stop all these special interest groups B.S. to pass their agenda.

By: Deanna

Deanna — Fri, 19 Oct 2018 00:22:20 +0000

This logrolling is just wrong. Vote NO on all multi-issue amendments.

By: nod

nod — Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:28:26 +0000

vote no on all amendments. this should be a legislature process not just some special interest group getting their agenda on the ballot with a few signatures. some of these amendments are so confusing. vote yes if you want your dog to vote, and then it says yes if you do not want your dog to vote. vaping and oil on the same amendment, just plain stupid,
ps also vote no on retaining judges, that is something that has never happened.

By: BentStraight

BentStraight — Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:01:43 +0000

These “proposed constitutional amendments” have caused trouble before, we have a representative state legislature that is supposed to work through all these issues, but when some group can’t get their way they try to shortcut with a “ballot initiative” hoping that many voters will be ignorant of all of the issues involved. I urge wise voters to reject this approach and vote down these attempts at “logrolling — combining popular and unpopular proposals into a single proposal”.

By: Jason

Jason — Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:29:04 +0000

I planned on voting NO all three of the aforementioned amendments being challenged in the courts – plus 4 others amendments. Many of these items should be addressed by the Legislature and thru a constitutional change.

By: Voter

Voter — Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:09:32 +0000

What I will do and my advice to all voters is vote NO on all multi issue ballot initiatives.