Comments on: State Argues Against Anonymity In Gun Law Challenge

By: John

John — Sat, 29 Sep 2018 14:07:24 +0000

We really need to consider that certain counties and cities have more problems than others, and why can’t gun violence issues or legislation be handled at the local level rather than the state and national level. When it is generally predictable one area is going to have more problems, why should it be allowed to affect all? The path that we are on will continue to erode our gun rights. If you want to make a difference pass legislation to make gun violence issues a local matter only and where the state and the national government cannot get involved.

By: William in Beulah

William in Beulah — Fri, 28 Sep 2018 02:07:14 +0000

nod, I agree with you, our kids are good enough to die for their country at 18 but they are to immature to par take in its liberties. If 18 is an adult, let them do adult activities, once again the hypocrisy lives on.

By: nod

nod — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 23:15:50 +0000

if you cannot own a gun till you are 21 then you should not be allowed in the military till you are 21. what a disgrace, a 20 year old comes home from war where he/she killed many enemy and was shot, then he goes to buy a gun and is told, you are too young. same person goes to get a drink, again you are too young. amazing,.

By: Tabby

Tabby — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:37:52 +0000

Did y’all hear the one about the guy who forgot that he left his AR-15 on his front porch all day ? The gun was still there when he got home and guess what ? It didn’t kill anyone.

By: jp

jp — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:32:26 +0000

This now law that our district 1 Senator Doug Broxson voted for, that Govornor Rick Scott signed and Attorney General Pam Bondie is defending is an obviously flawed law.
It is obvious that anyone standing up against the liberal left comes under real danger of attacks. We see this every day.
Some of the young NRA members should stand up and join the challenge against this law. As always this is just a stepping stone to totally banning all guns.
What is next? To old to own a gun? That is already being talked about.
If young people can be prevented from owing guns there will be less voters in the future that understand their use and will defend our 2nd Amendment.
The gun banners will take anything they can get to futher their cause.

Question: If under 21 years of age prevents you from purchasing a gun does that mean that you can’t legeally use or posses one? Is that like alcohol? Do you trust every and all law enforcement officers to not arrest any under 21 year old they see hunting or even holding a gun.
Don’t forget that it is also a law that you can not buy a gun for another person. This is called a Straw Purchase.

It is clear that Rick Scott’s possible goal is to gain favor with the liberal South Florida voters and defeat Democrat Bill Nelson, even disregarding the conflict with the 2nd Amendment.
It’s not so clear what Doug Broxson and Pam Bondi’s motives are.

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:43:58 +0000

“…after the Feb. 14 mass shooting that killed 17 people .”? A “mass shooting” didn’t kill anyone. A sick, deranged person did. We need to stop letting these perpetrators of the hook through the use of neutralizing language and remember that this was a single person that did this, not some idea or category of behavior.