There are many “main point”s for different folks. For many, it is sexual equality.

Quite possibly the “victims” only had intercourse out of pity, her being so old and all. Even if they yelled, “Yes! Yes!” and high fived each other, it was likely because they didn’t want to hurt her feelings, them being so tender-hearted and all.

Unless she held direct authority over the innocent children in question, she didn’t really place them in a position of submission. If they took her classes and their grades depended on extra credit, yes, she did something worse than just have intercourse with Jay boys — disgusting though that sounds.

You assume that was the reason they involved themselves with her, I have my doubts. It was bad, but maybe not worth killing her over. A’s aren’t that hard to get.

David for A+

It’s an unfortunate event all around.

If that were so, a 17 year-old could not commit rape at knifepoint or gunpoint if the other party were over 18. The act would be the same but the victim reversed.

In 1989, 13-year-old Joe Sullivan was convicted of the brutal burglary and rape of a 72-year-old woman in Pensacola. They did not charge the woman with statutory rape even though he was a minor and she was an adult.

David for reason

Actually, that is incorrect because Florida law makes exceptions when age difference isn’t that large or when the victim is drugged without prior knowledge. Sure, after the tenth or 20th drugging, she should grow suspicious and it is unreasonable to even think these upstanding young children would ever do anything wrong, but without personally knowing their impeccable character, we don’t personally know they didn’t. (After all, their grandparents might have come from a more sinful place.)

https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2011/794.011
“4 (d) When the offender, without the prior knowledge or consent of the victim, administers or has knowledge of someone else administering to the victim any narcotic, anesthetic, or other intoxicating substance which mentally or physically incapacitates the victim.”

Anyhow, if an adult were unknowingly drugged by a minor and then used while unconscious or otherwise incapacitated, the adult becomes the victim. not the attacker.

Under the law.

David for contemplation and repentance

Actually we do… Florida Statutes are pretty clear. Adults cannot have sex with a person under the age of 18. Regardless of whether or not you think these boys are victims, according to the law, she committed Statutory Rape. SHE is the perpetrator and the boys are still the victim.

Show me cases where an adult male and a underage female have “consensual” sex and the case is dropped against the male… I can’t think of any. That’s because someone who is underage cannot actually give consent… not legally.

Are you drunk? She is the adult and the person in a position of authority. It is all her fault. It doesn’t matter if a young stud comes on to her. Her job is to say no. Actually to say helllll no!!!! Stop blaming victims and take responsibility for sick actions!!!