Comments on: Appeals Court Rules Against State In ‘Docs Vs. Glocks’ Case http://www.northescambia.com/2017/02/appeals-court-rules-against-state-in-docs-vs-glocks-case Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment Sun, 05 Apr 2026 20:28:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jim http://www.northescambia.com/2017/02/appeals-court-rules-against-state-in-docs-vs-glocks-case/comment-page-1#comment-337943 Jim Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:33:17 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=277910#comment-337943 Garantee if the question was could a doctor ask if a woman had ever had an abortion, those same judges would had ruled it unconstitutional. Even though abortion could be part of a patients medical history. Garantee if the question was could a doctor ask if a woman had ever had an abortion, those same judges would had ruled it unconstitutional. Even though abortion could be part of a patients medical history.

]]> By: David Huie Green http://www.northescambia.com/2017/02/appeals-court-rules-against-state-in-docs-vs-glocks-case/comment-page-1#comment-337840 David Huie Green Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:32:20 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=277910#comment-337840 (Or if the doctor's about to give you your bill) (Or if the doctor’s about to give you your bill)

]]> By: Mark http://www.northescambia.com/2017/02/appeals-court-rules-against-state-in-docs-vs-glocks-case/comment-page-1#comment-337820 Mark Sat, 18 Feb 2017 02:09:38 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=277910#comment-337820 The only reason a medical professional should ask about firearms if they just diagnosed you as having some type of mental illness that makes you a danger to yourself or others. The only reason a medical professional should ask about firearms if they just diagnosed you as having some type of mental illness that makes you a danger to yourself or others.

]]> By: David Huie Green http://www.northescambia.com/2017/02/appeals-court-rules-against-state-in-docs-vs-glocks-case/comment-page-1#comment-337816 David Huie Green Sat, 18 Feb 2017 00:33:05 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=277910#comment-337816 A law which forbids a citizen from asking a question is a law which limits speech. A law which requires a citizen to answer a question is also a law which limits speech (and is also forbidden under the fifth amendment if the answer would tend to be admission of a crime). Just assume the patient is armed, the odds favor it. David for safe assumptions A law which forbids a citizen from asking a question is a law which limits speech.

A law which requires a citizen to answer a question is also a law which limits speech (and is also forbidden under the fifth amendment if the answer would tend to be admission of a crime).

Just assume the patient is armed, the odds favor it.

David for safe assumptions

]]> By: Sedition http://www.northescambia.com/2017/02/appeals-court-rules-against-state-in-docs-vs-glocks-case/comment-page-1#comment-337767 Sedition Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:06:36 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=277910#comment-337767 OK, Docs...get ready for a tirade of verbal abuse if you even make me think that you're going to ask me a question about firearms ownership. I may ask questions of you that you don't care for. Would you care to make a bet of who will ask the most offensive question? You study MEDICINE...keep your nose there. Otherwise, I may have to ask some very uncomfortable questions of you. OK, Docs…get ready for a tirade of verbal abuse if you even make me think that you’re going to ask me a question about firearms ownership. I may ask questions of you that you don’t care for. Would you care to make a bet of who will ask the most offensive question?
You study MEDICINE…keep your nose there. Otherwise, I may have to ask some very uncomfortable questions of you.

]]> By: Kate http://www.northescambia.com/2017/02/appeals-court-rules-against-state-in-docs-vs-glocks-case/comment-page-1#comment-337764 Kate Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:39:37 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=277910#comment-337764 On again does it occur to anyone that perhaps the Florida Supreme Court is siding with the LAW and not a group. On again does it occur to anyone that perhaps the Florida Supreme Court is siding with the LAW and not a group.

]]>