<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debate Emerges On Carving Up &#8216;Docs V. Glocks&#8217; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northescambia.com/2016/07/debate-emerges-on-carving-up-docs-v-glocks-law/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2016/07/debate-emerges-on-carving-up-docs-v-glocks-law</link>
	<description>Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aceman</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2016/07/debate-emerges-on-carving-up-docs-v-glocks-law/comment-page-1#comment-326620</link>
		<dc:creator>Aceman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 18:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=259165#comment-326620</guid>
		<description>amazing how a government agency can use it as a information gathering service. Its not about a doctor its about getting information to use for a file on gun ownership. Even ray Charles can see that from his grave .......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amazing how a government agency can use it as a information gathering service. Its not about a doctor its about getting information to use for a file on gun ownership. Even ray Charles can see that from his grave &#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robinhood</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2016/07/debate-emerges-on-carving-up-docs-v-glocks-law/comment-page-1#comment-326461</link>
		<dc:creator>Robinhood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 20:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=259165#comment-326461</guid>
		<description>When asked by a doctor if you own a &quot;GUN&quot; all you need to do is either tell them it is &quot;None of their Business&quot;  or just lie to them and tell them &quot;No Guns&quot; are in the home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When asked by a doctor if you own a &#8220;GUN&#8221; all you need to do is either tell them it is &#8220;None of their Business&#8221;  or just lie to them and tell them &#8220;No Guns&#8221; are in the home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2016/07/debate-emerges-on-carving-up-docs-v-glocks-law/comment-page-1#comment-326455</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=259165#comment-326455</guid>
		<description>There is a great difference between expressing an opinion and in recording, and building a file, of contrary opinions to be used against a Constitution-guaranteed right exercised by the holders of those contrary opinions.

Doctors cannot -- cannot -- record information about patient or patients&#039; parents&#039; gun ownership without involving themselves in politics, and that they have no right to do in the context of delivering heath care and especially with the implied threat, or the practice of, refusing such care.

Let them lecture.  Let them distribute pamphlets or fliers, so long as they don&#039;t target ObamaCare families from whom the choice of a physician has been removed.  Other patients can seek another doctor if the anti-gun position of the doctor becomes offensive.  But doctors should have should have to cease and desist at the first demand of ObamaCare families, from whom the right to pick their own physician has been taken (contrary to the bald-faced lies of our President).  But do not let them require participation in record-keeping of gun ownership.  That is contrary to the Florida Code, which prohibits the required registration of firearms by any entity, public or private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a great difference between expressing an opinion and in recording, and building a file, of contrary opinions to be used against a Constitution-guaranteed right exercised by the holders of those contrary opinions.</p>
<p>Doctors cannot &#8212; cannot &#8212; record information about patient or patients&#8217; parents&#8217; gun ownership without involving themselves in politics, and that they have no right to do in the context of delivering heath care and especially with the implied threat, or the practice of, refusing such care.</p>
<p>Let them lecture.  Let them distribute pamphlets or fliers, so long as they don&#8217;t target ObamaCare families from whom the choice of a physician has been removed.  Other patients can seek another doctor if the anti-gun position of the doctor becomes offensive.  But doctors should have should have to cease and desist at the first demand of ObamaCare families, from whom the right to pick their own physician has been taken (contrary to the bald-faced lies of our President).  But do not let them require participation in record-keeping of gun ownership.  That is contrary to the Florida Code, which prohibits the required registration of firearms by any entity, public or private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
