I try to speak respectfully, it does me little harm.

” You are clueless, my friend.”

I get that a lot, the first part anyway.

“you whine about “hiding” behind a false name, for the very purpose of badmouthing him.”

I never whine. I recognized and acknowledged there can be good reason for it. My point remains that evidence doesn’t support the claim.

” your silly sign offs.(a little pretentious, don’t you think? As if you’re brain is better than anyone else’s).”

Not EVERYBODY but some, fo’ sho’. You have my regretful permission to skip them. (and it’s “your”)

” I PROMISE you, I would square off with this heartless man and “set him straight”.”

Then it is a shame he came secretly and you missed your chance.

“you have displayed your true feelings in regards to your political values and that you support a man who is a crook!”

Obviously not since I voted for Fariq in preference both times. (Check the Byrneville vote, I doubt he got more than one vote either time.) As far as I’m concerned, our governor’s a thief for stealing from us contractual guarantees. If I’m fired for saying so, so be it. My name’s at the top of this note.

“David for “silly snippets” ”
and better people
and a joyful life

Hey David, there are numerous things wrong with your post. First, you called Rick Scott a gentleman! You are clueless, my friend. Second, you whine about “hiding” behind a false name, for the very purpose of badmouthing him. News flash, some people that post about this crook are State employees and there are policies in place that call for employee termination if you “badmouth” your Governor. (google it)

I usually enjoy your comments, except for your silly sign offs.(a little pretentious, don’t you think? As if you’re brain is better than anyone else’s).

Your other comment, Hiding one’s identity may be prudent but it really doesn’t support the claim one would face Governor Scott face-to-face and set him straight” doesn’t really make sense. Please explain exactly “what” doesn’t support the claim to go face to face with a criminal. Do you mean hiding one’s identity? Be more specific because I do not see the nexus. I PROMISE you, I would square off with this heartless man and “set him straight”.

Like I said earlier, we should NOT fear him! You might, but I don’t!

You’re standing with me has dropped a few notches I do enjoy your logic, most of the time. However, this time you have displayed your true feelings in regards to your political values and that you support a man who is a crook!

Hey David, we’re still good, you and I. Just ease up on the David for “silly snippets”.

It would be easier to disprove if false names weren’t being used to badmouth the gentleman.

Hiding one’s identity may be prudent but it really doesn’t support the claim one would face Governor Scott face-to-face and set him straight.

Regardless, this part is absolutely true:
“Rick Scott was elected by us, not appointed by the Queen of England. We are NOT supposed to fear our representatives and cower as they walk by. ”

David for supporting evidence
and proper respect to public servants
(neither too much nor too little)