<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guns Targeted In Domestic Violence, Stalking Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northescambia.com/2015/12/guns-targeted-in-domestic-violence-stalking-cases/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/12/guns-targeted-in-domestic-violence-stalking-cases</link>
	<description>Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 21:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Traumaqueen</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/12/guns-targeted-in-domestic-violence-stalking-cases/comment-page-1#comment-313176</link>
		<dc:creator>Traumaqueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=237297#comment-313176</guid>
		<description>How many abusers, whether it be a man or woman, admits to abusing someone else? Better to aire on the side of caution than to jeopardize an abuser retalliating or escalating? If the abuser did commit the crime then surely it didn&#039;t matter if his rights were violated because he didn&#039;t much care about breaking the law and losing his rights in the first place. 

I venture to guess that there are fewer false accusations than true cases of abuse. Just a guess..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many abusers, whether it be a man or woman, admits to abusing someone else? Better to aire on the side of caution than to jeopardize an abuser retalliating or escalating? If the abuser did commit the crime then surely it didn&#8217;t matter if his rights were violated because he didn&#8217;t much care about breaking the law and losing his rights in the first place. </p>
<p>I venture to guess that there are fewer false accusations than true cases of abuse. Just a guess..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sedition</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/12/guns-targeted-in-domestic-violence-stalking-cases/comment-page-1#comment-313150</link>
		<dc:creator>Sedition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=237297#comment-313150</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re going to be a bear, be a Grizzly. If they are going to attempt to remove Constitutionally protected rights without due process, make them pay a heavy price for it.
&quot;When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.&quot;
    Thomas Jefferson
    3rd president of US (1743 - 1826)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going to be a bear, be a Grizzly. If they are going to attempt to remove Constitutionally protected rights without due process, make them pay a heavy price for it.<br />
&#8220;When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.&#8221;<br />
    Thomas Jefferson<br />
    3rd president of US (1743 &#8211; 1826)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pensacola pete</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/12/guns-targeted-in-domestic-violence-stalking-cases/comment-page-1#comment-312963</link>
		<dc:creator>Pensacola pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=237297#comment-312963</guid>
		<description>SW is right, there is no due process. A constitutional right is suspended simply because a judge makes a ruling on &quot;he said, she said&quot; information. 

The right to bear arms is dismissed arbitrarily, but why stop there? If one right can be refused, what about the rest? Why not also take away the right to trial by jury? Someone tells the court you&#039;re a threat and you&#039;re imprisoned without trial for an indefinite time. 

Does a sworn statement justify suspending your Constitutional right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, freedom of speech or allow cruel and unusual punishment?

I agree that legitimate threats need to be contained but allowing any government agency to deny the Constitutional rights of citizens (that&#039;s you and me, kids) opens the door to abuses our founding fathers feared over two hundred years ago!

Soapbox returned to the next speaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SW is right, there is no due process. A constitutional right is suspended simply because a judge makes a ruling on &#8220;he said, she said&#8221; information. </p>
<p>The right to bear arms is dismissed arbitrarily, but why stop there? If one right can be refused, what about the rest? Why not also take away the right to trial by jury? Someone tells the court you&#8217;re a threat and you&#8217;re imprisoned without trial for an indefinite time. </p>
<p>Does a sworn statement justify suspending your Constitutional right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, freedom of speech or allow cruel and unusual punishment?</p>
<p>I agree that legitimate threats need to be contained but allowing any government agency to deny the Constitutional rights of citizens (that&#8217;s you and me, kids) opens the door to abuses our founding fathers feared over two hundred years ago!</p>
<p>Soapbox returned to the next speaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SW</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/12/guns-targeted-in-domestic-violence-stalking-cases/comment-page-1#comment-312931</link>
		<dc:creator>SW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=237297#comment-312931</guid>
		<description>While they&#039;re at it, why not go ahead and add them to the &#039;No-Fly&#039; list?

Where is due process, here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While they&#8217;re at it, why not go ahead and add them to the &#8216;No-Fly&#8217; list?</p>
<p>Where is due process, here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esc co leo</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/12/guns-targeted-in-domestic-violence-stalking-cases/comment-page-1#comment-312876</link>
		<dc:creator>Esc co leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 16:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=237297#comment-312876</guid>
		<description>Anyone can file for an injunction. If the alleged conduct is bad enough, the judge will immediately give a temporary injunction that is only valid until the hearing for the permanent injunction, which is usually two weeks. At the hearing, both sides present their case and the judge makes a determination. 

And yes, the law already requires people with a domestic violence injunction to surrender their firearms, and you cannot purchase others (there is a question on the background form about this when purchasing from a licensed dealer.)

Of course, there are ways to still obtain guns, but it is an arrest able offense if law enforcement discovers it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone can file for an injunction. If the alleged conduct is bad enough, the judge will immediately give a temporary injunction that is only valid until the hearing for the permanent injunction, which is usually two weeks. At the hearing, both sides present their case and the judge makes a determination. </p>
<p>And yes, the law already requires people with a domestic violence injunction to surrender their firearms, and you cannot purchase others (there is a question on the background form about this when purchasing from a licensed dealer.)</p>
<p>Of course, there are ways to still obtain guns, but it is an arrest able offense if law enforcement discovers it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufus</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/12/guns-targeted-in-domestic-violence-stalking-cases/comment-page-1#comment-312862</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 13:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=237297#comment-312862</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t anyone go down to the clerk of court and file a domestic violence injunction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t anyone go down to the clerk of court and file a domestic violence injunction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: traumaqueen</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/12/guns-targeted-in-domestic-violence-stalking-cases/comment-page-1#comment-312842</link>
		<dc:creator>traumaqueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 07:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=237297#comment-312842</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong but isn&#039;t this already covered within the injunction itself? Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong but isn&#8217;t this already covered within the injunction itself? Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
