<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Policies Targeted For Shift Out Of Citizens Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northescambia.com/2015/09/more-policies-targeted-for-shift-out-of-citizens-insurance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/09/more-policies-targeted-for-shift-out-of-citizens-insurance</link>
	<description>Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 03:16:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: c.w.</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/09/more-policies-targeted-for-shift-out-of-citizens-insurance/comment-page-1#comment-307237</link>
		<dc:creator>c.w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=228002#comment-307237</guid>
		<description>Citizens insurance co. never should have been forced on the people. It has &quot;forced&quot; everyone that has insurance no matter if it&#039;s homeowners or auto to help pay for the few to live where they shouldn&#039;t.   Sounds a lot like communism to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citizens insurance co. never should have been forced on the people. It has &#8220;forced&#8221; everyone that has insurance no matter if it&#8217;s homeowners or auto to help pay for the few to live where they shouldn&#8217;t.   Sounds a lot like communism to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2015/09/more-policies-targeted-for-shift-out-of-citizens-insurance/comment-page-1#comment-307197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 06:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=228002#comment-307197</guid>
		<description>Every citizen in the State of Florida who purchases insurance pays a subsidy to offset cost associated with the operations for &quot;Citizens Property Insurance&quot;. The use of &quot;Citizens Property Insurance&quot; is for those who were unable to obtain insurance from a private vendor. When a &quot;private vendor&quot; offers a policy to those current customers of &quot;Citizens Property Insurance&quot; and these customers reject the newly offered policy, then these customers should no longer get subsidized rates from Citizens Property Insurance&quot; as &quot;Citizens Property Insurance&quot; is no longer a &quot;last resort option&quot;. 

Many of those policy being maintained by the State are considered &quot;risky&quot; properties. I shouldnt be required to continue to subsidize those who opt to either build or rebuild in &quot;risky&quot; areas. If you can afford waterfront or other &quot;risky areas&quot; you should be able to afford your own insurance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every citizen in the State of Florida who purchases insurance pays a subsidy to offset cost associated with the operations for &#8220;Citizens Property Insurance&#8221;. The use of &#8220;Citizens Property Insurance&#8221; is for those who were unable to obtain insurance from a private vendor. When a &#8220;private vendor&#8221; offers a policy to those current customers of &#8220;Citizens Property Insurance&#8221; and these customers reject the newly offered policy, then these customers should no longer get subsidized rates from Citizens Property Insurance&#8221; as &#8220;Citizens Property Insurance&#8221; is no longer a &#8220;last resort option&#8221;. </p>
<p>Many of those policy being maintained by the State are considered &#8220;risky&#8221; properties. I shouldnt be required to continue to subsidize those who opt to either build or rebuild in &#8220;risky&#8221; areas. If you can afford waterfront or other &#8220;risky areas&#8221; you should be able to afford your own insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
