<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State Points To Possible Clarification Of Gay Marriage Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling</link>
	<description>Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chris in Molino</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-288893</link>
		<dc:creator>chris in Molino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 05:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=202020#comment-288893</guid>
		<description>I noticed neither CW or RTR didn&#039;t want to comment on my constitution reference. Although correct in that just because the majority votes on something doesn&#039;t make it constitutional comment,  in this case it is so. Every court in the nation ponders the mindset and intentions of the writers of the constitution in such cases. In this instance, were George Washington alive and in charge today, NO DOUBT he would have numerous judges removed by force, but instead, the writers are rolling in their graves at how their intentions, their words, have been degraded, perverted, and just blatantly ignored to make some feel justified in how they want to live. And don&#039;t feel bad you two, its not just this issue, its everything. They ought to literally rip up the real constitution because the one they go by is NOTHING like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed neither CW or RTR didn&#8217;t want to comment on my constitution reference. Although correct in that just because the majority votes on something doesn&#8217;t make it constitutional comment,  in this case it is so. Every court in the nation ponders the mindset and intentions of the writers of the constitution in such cases. In this instance, were George Washington alive and in charge today, NO DOUBT he would have numerous judges removed by force, but instead, the writers are rolling in their graves at how their intentions, their words, have been degraded, perverted, and just blatantly ignored to make some feel justified in how they want to live. And don&#8217;t feel bad you two, its not just this issue, its everything. They ought to literally rip up the real constitution because the one they go by is NOTHING like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-288883</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=202020#comment-288883</guid>
		<description>what is the big deal people if two people want to get married who does that hurt? I don&#039;t care what someone does as long it doesn&#039;t hurt anyone. so two people who love each other what does that hurt not me not you. its really non of my business. Its like in the 60 when black and whites were getting married what&#039;s the big deal if gay couples get married what&#039;s the big deal the bible thumpers need to keep there self out of this stop judging&gt; judging is a sin too everything we do in life is a sin divorce a sin I don&#039;t understand people love one another the world would be a better place, but we cant we judge and we hate anyone that is different than how you were raised. We are not born to hate one another we learn to hate people and things that are different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the big deal people if two people want to get married who does that hurt? I don&#8217;t care what someone does as long it doesn&#8217;t hurt anyone. so two people who love each other what does that hurt not me not you. its really non of my business. Its like in the 60 when black and whites were getting married what&#8217;s the big deal if gay couples get married what&#8217;s the big deal the bible thumpers need to keep there self out of this stop judging&gt; judging is a sin too everything we do in life is a sin divorce a sin I don&#8217;t understand people love one another the world would be a better place, but we cant we judge and we hate anyone that is different than how you were raised. We are not born to hate one another we learn to hate people and things that are different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTR</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-288804</link>
		<dc:creator>RTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=202020#comment-288804</guid>
		<description>Amen CW...some people will never understand that.  A ban on equal rights never should have gone to the ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen CW&#8230;some people will never understand that.  A ban on equal rights never should have gone to the ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CW</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-288787</link>
		<dc:creator>CW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 03:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=202020#comment-288787</guid>
		<description>I guess some people just don&#039;t get it. Just because the majority votes on something doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s constitutional. This is the whole reason why we have a judicial system. What the majority wants isn&#039;t always right, just look back at the 1960&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess some people just don&#8217;t get it. Just because the majority votes on something doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s constitutional. This is the whole reason why we have a judicial system. What the majority wants isn&#8217;t always right, just look back at the 1960&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-288779</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 01:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=202020#comment-288779</guid>
		<description>so ....here we go ..Why do we waste our time voting for some lawyer to get some judge to overrule what was voted claiming it is unconstitutional. Lets see.... the constitution gives &quot;RIGHTS&quot; to married couples.... what are the Rights given?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so &#8230;.here we go ..Why do we waste our time voting for some lawyer to get some judge to overrule what was voted claiming it is unconstitutional. Lets see&#8230;. the constitution gives &#8220;RIGHTS&#8221; to married couples&#8230;. what are the Rights given?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris in Molino</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-288774</link>
		<dc:creator>chris in Molino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=202020#comment-288774</guid>
		<description>I for one fully support the AG. However, the &quot;Shrinking number of citizens &quot; comment is completely ignorant.  An overwhelming majority of voters support the definition of marriage as being between a woman and man. The fact that this is still an issue only confirms my theory that the government has a hidden agenda to destroy our culture, our communities, our lives. How else do you explain a small percentage of people having such a powerful voice over the whole. Oh, RTR, during the time these &quot;RIGHTS&quot; you speak of were written in the constitution, gays and lesbians weren&#039;t just not allowed to marry, they weren&#039;t allowed to live ! They were hung. Thats something, coming from a time when they named a bible after a flaming homosexual and child molester. So they came to a new land for freedom. Some just take that word to mean &quot;freedom to do whatever i want&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one fully support the AG. However, the &#8220;Shrinking number of citizens &#8221; comment is completely ignorant.  An overwhelming majority of voters support the definition of marriage as being between a woman and man. The fact that this is still an issue only confirms my theory that the government has a hidden agenda to destroy our culture, our communities, our lives. How else do you explain a small percentage of people having such a powerful voice over the whole. Oh, RTR, during the time these &#8220;RIGHTS&#8221; you speak of were written in the constitution, gays and lesbians weren&#8217;t just not allowed to marry, they weren&#8217;t allowed to live ! They were hung. Thats something, coming from a time when they named a bible after a flaming homosexual and child molester. So they came to a new land for freedom. Some just take that word to mean &#8220;freedom to do whatever i want&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melodies4us</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-288770</link>
		<dc:creator>melodies4us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 22:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=202020#comment-288770</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused also. Didn&#039;t &quot;We the people&quot; vote a majority in favor of banning same sex marriages in Florida?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused also. Didn&#8217;t &#8220;We the people&#8221; vote a majority in favor of banning same sex marriages in Florida?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTR</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-288758</link>
		<dc:creator>RTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=202020#comment-288758</guid>
		<description>Our &quot;conservative&quot; AG would rather waste the tax payers dollars dragging this out in court than to cave to the shrinking number of citizens in Florida that want to deny equal rights to everyone.  I thought republicans wanted less government in their business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our &#8220;conservative&#8221; AG would rather waste the tax payers dollars dragging this out in court than to cave to the shrinking number of citizens in Florida that want to deny equal rights to everyone.  I thought republicans wanted less government in their business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeeperman</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/12/state-points-to-possible-clarification-of-gay-marriage-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-288739</link>
		<dc:creator>jeeperman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=202020#comment-288739</guid>
		<description>I guess I am just a dumb country hick.
My small brain tells me if the STATE WIDE ban is deemed unconstitutional in one Florida county, I presume it is unconstitutional in ALL Florida counties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I am just a dumb country hick.<br />
My small brain tells me if the STATE WIDE ban is deemed unconstitutional in one Florida county, I presume it is unconstitutional in ALL Florida counties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
