Comments on: Grand Jury Finds Insufficient Evidence Of Any Criminal Wrongdoing In Jail Explosion

By: David Huie Green

David Huie Green — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:46:43 +0000

CONTEMPLATING:
“a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich if the puppetmaster in the SA office so determines……and now recommendations from a grand jury…….does anybody else see the problem?”

Yes. It would be wrong to indict any ham sandwiches.

David for not abusing power

By: g.locust

g.locust — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 03:32:12 +0000

recommendations from a grand jury……a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich if the puppetmaster in the SA office so determines……and now recommendations from a grand jury…….does anybody else see the problem?

By: Common Sense

Common Sense — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:24:49 +0000

The best thing on the list, let the Sheriff take back over the jail. Politicians have no business operating a jail. At least the Grand Jury has some common sense. There will me more problems in the future if the County Commissioners run the jail.

By: David HUIE Green

David HUIE Green — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:49:34 +0000

REGARDING:
“Go figure, the cops investigating themselves.”

A grand jury is not composed of “cops”.

David for truth

By: David HUIE Green

David HUIE Green — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:45:40 +0000

“David, any civilian or private entity whose negligence in responding to reports of leaking gas that ultimately killed two people and injured hundreds of others would be charged with criminal negligence or manslaughter.”

So every corrections officer should be charged with manslaughter, even the ones crippled by the explosion?

Fascinating

David for shotgun indictments

By: David HUIE Green

David HUIE Green — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:40:01 +0000

REGARDING:
PS why do you always comment & pick apart other peoples comments or opinions ? Instead of just commenting on the news article itself …”

I don’t.

I usually just comment on false statements. A neighbor of mine was killed in the explosion but he wasn’t a close friend, not that it would matter. Nobody intentionally blew him up.

Since everybody who should have known to shut off the gas was in danger of being blown up, I just don’t believe any of them was likely to have not done so knowingly. Further, without the information the grand jury had, it would be wrong to fault them and I haven’t.

David for the benefit of the doubt

By: Mark T

Mark T — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:52:32 +0000

@ DH Green , I would bet you wouldn’t think it was “silly” or “unbecoming of a Americn citizen” , if it were your friends or relatives that were killed or injured in that explosion!! PS why do you always comment & pick apart other peoples comments or opinions ? Instead of just commenting on the news article itself ….

By: Jimmy Troy

Jimmy Troy — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:14:25 +0000

Go figure, the cops investigating themselves. Did anyone actually expect a different outcome. Not likely. Times are gonna change soon.

By: Dave S

Dave S — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:30:16 +0000

The grand jury findings directly affect the insurance payouts and FEMA checks. Because the explosion was not due to negligence, but due to flooding, the county now gets full payment. Less for us taxpayers to kick in for the new facility.

By: INFERNAL BEAR

INFERNAL BEAR — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:21:51 +0000

David, any civilian or private entity whose negligence in responding to reports of leaking gas that ultimately killed two people and injured hundreds of others would be charged with criminal negligence or manslaughter. Yes, their job is to maintain control of convicted criminals, but they are also solely responsible for their well-being. And based on this ruling, there is no accountability to be held for their negligence.