Comments on: Escambia Deputy Fired, Investigated For Alleged Non-Consensual Sex Act

By: Connie Lee

Connie Lee — Sat, 19 Jul 2014 14:53:04 +0000

Ewww, so so sad

By: BBInTheKnow

BBInTheKnow — Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:08:25 +0000

First of all I don’t condone Mr. Majors behavior but …sex while on duty or on the job happens all the time in local and federal L.E, even in little ole Pensacola. The only difference this time is that someone screamed non consensual and the deputy got found out. Mr. Majors next time remember no means no and/or never peeve off a woman who can have your job

By: Don

Don — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:09:48 +0000

IF the D.A does not proceed on this then that means those hired to “protect and serve” are truly above the law,if a “probationary” officer can walk away unscathed imagine a 15 year tenured officer….the citizens of this community WILL be watching this case closely!

By: paul

paul — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:10:57 +0000

If they’re taking DNA and the results come back positive I think he should be guilty on all charges.. his word isn’t good anymore if he would has sex on duty consensual or not..

By: fred

fred — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:22:09 +0000

Innocent until proven guilty is for criminal proceedings, which this is not…yet. The deputy admitted to a firing offense (sexual act with the citizen while on duty). He was fired, not convicted. Now, if the State Attorney decides to move forward with an investigation and go for indictment and prosecution, then we’re talking about proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
But, really, do you want deputies doing this on duty, even with consent?

By: Matt

Matt — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:10:20 +0000

Does not matter if he is guilty of sex charges. He DID admit to a sexual act while on duty. That is plenty of reason to fire him. This is the very reason is against the rules durring duty, to keep just this type of thing from tainting the whole department when a question of weather it was against her will or not.

By: Mic Hall

Mic Hall — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:09:22 +0000

If it was non-consensual he should be convicted. Never to work in ANY law enforcement ever again.

If it was consensual he needs to be FIRED! I know if I had sex at work, no matter what, I would be fired. I am pretty sure that is in the regs for law enforcement too.

By: Ray

Ray — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:13:27 +0000

What every happen to inasent untill proven guilty sounds like the sheriff is a one man jury their are two sides of every story.

By: AC

AC — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:59:45 +0000

@ Freda Whaley:

“Non -consensual sex act? Isn’t that rape?”

Not necessarily. A “sex act” is not limited to sexual intercourse. It could have been unwanted touching of certain areas or other acts that did not include intercourse. The elements of the crime of rape usually requires certain criteria which I do not want to write on a family-friendly website (if you know what I mean). There are many other sex acts that do not rise to the level of rape, but are still illegal. Not sure what specifically he did, or what he is accused of doing, but it may or may not be actual rape as defined by statute.

By: haley

haley — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:42:42 +0000

Good point Freda. What does non-consensual sex act mean? Kind of a wierd story. Sounds like rape to me. Why is it not referred to as rape?