<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doctors Will Appeal &#8216;Docs Vs. Glocks&#8217; Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling</link>
	<description>Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 02:06:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-276038</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=185894#comment-276038</guid>
		<description>I believe the government wants to institute this policy because when this country has been pulled into a dictatorship, they will know just where to go and confiscate your firearms. Don&#039;t believe it can happen here? All it will take is an executive order signed with the right people behind this administration, and things could change overnight. Homeland Security didn&#039;t just buy up over three billion dollars worth of bullets for target practice. Half of the bullets they bought are hollow point. According to the Geneva Convention, hollow points aren&#039;t used in war. Research info. On the armoured personnel carriers that have been purchased to be used on Americans in case of civil unrest. I&#039;m afraid this is just the tip of the iceberg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the government wants to institute this policy because when this country has been pulled into a dictatorship, they will know just where to go and confiscate your firearms. Don&#8217;t believe it can happen here? All it will take is an executive order signed with the right people behind this administration, and things could change overnight. Homeland Security didn&#8217;t just buy up over three billion dollars worth of bullets for target practice. Half of the bullets they bought are hollow point. According to the Geneva Convention, hollow points aren&#8217;t used in war. Research info. On the armoured personnel carriers that have been purchased to be used on Americans in case of civil unrest. I&#8217;m afraid this is just the tip of the iceberg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M in Bratt</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-276031</link>
		<dc:creator>M in Bratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=185894#comment-276031</guid>
		<description>Most are missing the most important point in this discussion.  With the advent of Obama-Care, ALL of your medical records are now being placed in the custody of the IRS for safekeeping.  If you doubt that as fact, ask your Dr. or Congressman.  Do you really trust the IRS with any more of your personal information than they have already accumulated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most are missing the most important point in this discussion.  With the advent of Obama-Care, ALL of your medical records are now being placed in the custody of the IRS for safekeeping.  If you doubt that as fact, ask your Dr. or Congressman.  Do you really trust the IRS with any more of your personal information than they have already accumulated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-275922</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=185894#comment-275922</guid>
		<description>The question is a hidden agenda for both sides and provokes just what everyone on this posting is doing. Bickering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is a hidden agenda for both sides and provokes just what everyone on this posting is doing. Bickering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-275913</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=185894#comment-275913</guid>
		<description>I have to wonder just how much all of these court proceedings have cost the taxpayers. Would it not be more efficient to put it before the citizens and let them decide if they want their doctors to ask them about their guns?. Stop wasting our money, lawyers and politicians. Must be close to a billion dollars at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder just how much all of these court proceedings have cost the taxpayers. Would it not be more efficient to put it before the citizens and let them decide if they want their doctors to ask them about their guns?. Stop wasting our money, lawyers and politicians. Must be close to a billion dollars at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-275806</link>
		<dc:creator>marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=185894#comment-275806</guid>
		<description>Actually it is pretty simple...Doc ask: Do you have firearms in your home? You answer: Sorry, but it is NONE of YOUR BUSINESS what I have in my home. Now, will you please provide me the Medical Help I came for? If not, report the DOC! Case Closed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it is pretty simple&#8230;Doc ask: Do you have firearms in your home? You answer: Sorry, but it is NONE of YOUR BUSINESS what I have in my home. Now, will you please provide me the Medical Help I came for? If not, report the DOC! Case Closed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NWFLA Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-275799</link>
		<dc:creator>NWFLA Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=185894#comment-275799</guid>
		<description>Opponents of the Circuit Court of Appeal’s decision say the gun lobby and its political cronies will silence the medical community from speaking the truth about gun dangers to patients. Their argument is worded to provoke fear, anger, and paint an untrue picture of malicious interference with the medical profession.

Believing folks are so uneducated about guns that they need their doctor to educate them while giving them a prostate exam, lancing a boil, or setting a broken leg is ludicrous.  With the ever increasing scarcity of doctors, the acknowledged increase in paperwork required for each patient thanks to Obamacare, the increase of patients to be seen each day (and made even worse with our nation’s newest population expansion thanks to the immigration issue), and no increase - even by executive order! - to the number of hours in each day, it would seem physicians&#039; time is better spent addressing the health concern presented before them during each appointment.  Side conversations about guns, seatbelts, swimming pools, hair dryers near bathtubs, avoiding outdoors/windows/plumbing during lightning storms, number and type of dogs or livestock owned, not running with scissors, etc. take up precious time needed to address the current issue or to provide enlightenment in areas of diet, exercise, stress control.   

Medical records will now be more subject to government scrutiny than they have ever been. It is not much of a leap to deduce the real purpose for providing gun ownership info to the new healthcare oversight agency, your friendly, apolitical, and efficient IRS, via our doctors&#039; records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opponents of the Circuit Court of Appeal’s decision say the gun lobby and its political cronies will silence the medical community from speaking the truth about gun dangers to patients. Their argument is worded to provoke fear, anger, and paint an untrue picture of malicious interference with the medical profession.</p>
<p>Believing folks are so uneducated about guns that they need their doctor to educate them while giving them a prostate exam, lancing a boil, or setting a broken leg is ludicrous.  With the ever increasing scarcity of doctors, the acknowledged increase in paperwork required for each patient thanks to Obamacare, the increase of patients to be seen each day (and made even worse with our nation’s newest population expansion thanks to the immigration issue), and no increase &#8211; even by executive order! &#8211; to the number of hours in each day, it would seem physicians&#8217; time is better spent addressing the health concern presented before them during each appointment.  Side conversations about guns, seatbelts, swimming pools, hair dryers near bathtubs, avoiding outdoors/windows/plumbing during lightning storms, number and type of dogs or livestock owned, not running with scissors, etc. take up precious time needed to address the current issue or to provide enlightenment in areas of diet, exercise, stress control.   </p>
<p>Medical records will now be more subject to government scrutiny than they have ever been. It is not much of a leap to deduce the real purpose for providing gun ownership info to the new healthcare oversight agency, your friendly, apolitical, and efficient IRS, via our doctors&#8217; records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-275797</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=185894#comment-275797</guid>
		<description>The only time the doctor would need to know this info is if the patient reports suicidal or homicidal thoughts or is seeking mental health treatment for these thoughts. Family or friends can then remove the weapons to a protected place until the condition no longer exists.  Otherwise, it ain&#039;t nobody&#039;s business if a person owns a gun or not and I will tell my doctor that it is none of her business if she asks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only time the doctor would need to know this info is if the patient reports suicidal or homicidal thoughts or is seeking mental health treatment for these thoughts. Family or friends can then remove the weapons to a protected place until the condition no longer exists.  Otherwise, it ain&#8217;t nobody&#8217;s business if a person owns a gun or not and I will tell my doctor that it is none of her business if she asks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gail</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-275793</link>
		<dc:creator>gail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=185894#comment-275793</guid>
		<description>I asked the same question. Why? Until I talked to my sister. They dont usually ask adults. This is a question that pediatricians ask.  They ask people with children. If you have a gun. Secure the gun. The also ask about swimming pools (security), chemicals, etc. Also, if the dr thinks patient may harm himself or others, 17 children were killed or injured in florida over the past year because of the accidental discharge of a firearm. Keep your gun. Just keep it safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked the same question. Why? Until I talked to my sister. They dont usually ask adults. This is a question that pediatricians ask.  They ask people with children. If you have a gun. Secure the gun. The also ask about swimming pools (security), chemicals, etc. Also, if the dr thinks patient may harm himself or others, 17 children were killed or injured in florida over the past year because of the accidental discharge of a firearm. Keep your gun. Just keep it safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob C</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-275787</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=185894#comment-275787</guid>
		<description>My doctors have never asked whether or not I own, possess or house a gun in my home or anywhere else.

They have also never asked if I have fresh batteries in the smoke alarms or if there is a fence around the pool or if there are child-safety latches on the cabinets and drawers in the kitchen nor have they asked if the dog has had its shots or if we make sure to dump standing water out of buckets and plants to prevent mosquitoes and they have not quizzed if there is a ready to use fire extinguisher in the home.  To me all of these are important to safety at my home.

From what we read this gun question is more about recording and reporting which of us may have firearms in our homes and to me that is an infringement upon my right to have and bear arms.  Where and how far would this information go if one answered &quot;Yes&quot; to the question.?

I am very confident my doctor has the skills to help me maintain my health.
However, I am not as certain that they have the &quot;gun sense&quot; to counsel anyone on the responsibilities of gun ownership and control.

Thank You, North Escambia for helping us maintain our First Amendment Rights as citizens of the United States of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My doctors have never asked whether or not I own, possess or house a gun in my home or anywhere else.</p>
<p>They have also never asked if I have fresh batteries in the smoke alarms or if there is a fence around the pool or if there are child-safety latches on the cabinets and drawers in the kitchen nor have they asked if the dog has had its shots or if we make sure to dump standing water out of buckets and plants to prevent mosquitoes and they have not quizzed if there is a ready to use fire extinguisher in the home.  To me all of these are important to safety at my home.</p>
<p>From what we read this gun question is more about recording and reporting which of us may have firearms in our homes and to me that is an infringement upon my right to have and bear arms.  Where and how far would this information go if one answered &#8220;Yes&#8221; to the question.?</p>
<p>I am very confident my doctor has the skills to help me maintain my health.<br />
However, I am not as certain that they have the &#8220;gun sense&#8221; to counsel anyone on the responsibilities of gun ownership and control.</p>
<p>Thank You, North Escambia for helping us maintain our First Amendment Rights as citizens of the United States of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molinoman</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/07/doctors-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling/comment-page-1#comment-275775</link>
		<dc:creator>molinoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=185894#comment-275775</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of baloney!   Dr&#039;s need to know gun ownership status!   Phoooey!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of baloney!   Dr&#8217;s need to know gun ownership status!   Phoooey!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
