<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MADD At Odds Over DUI Proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal</link>
	<description>Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/comment-page-1#comment-265465</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 18:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=175643#comment-265465</guid>
		<description>Gembeaux, the answer is *not* complete revocation of driving privileges for repeat offenders. More than half of people who have their license taken away continue to drive, and if they tend to drive drunk, then revocation does absolutely nothing. 

Interlocks are the way to go - it&#039;s the only measure that actually keeps people who have been drinking from getting behind the wheel. Yes, you can have someone else blow in to start, but the device demands a re-test after a few minutes. Are you going to take someone sober with you everywhere? Someone who&#039;s willing to drive with a drunk? Interlocks really do keep a great many drinkers off the roads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gembeaux, the answer is *not* complete revocation of driving privileges for repeat offenders. More than half of people who have their license taken away continue to drive, and if they tend to drive drunk, then revocation does absolutely nothing. </p>
<p>Interlocks are the way to go &#8211; it&#8217;s the only measure that actually keeps people who have been drinking from getting behind the wheel. Yes, you can have someone else blow in to start, but the device demands a re-test after a few minutes. Are you going to take someone sober with you everywhere? Someone who&#8217;s willing to drive with a drunk? Interlocks really do keep a great many drinkers off the roads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Coe</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/comment-page-1#comment-264184</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Coe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=175643#comment-264184</guid>
		<description>I think a big part of our problem with problem drinkers is that just about everywhere in society that we sell food and fuel we also sell alcohol. I don&#039;t support prohibition, but I really think as a society we need to look at how we allow alcohol to be advertised and where we allow it to be sold.
 We collect a lot of tax from Alcohol sales, but Alcohol related problems are very expensive to have to deal with and we don&#039;t seem to be gaining ground in stopping people from being stupid. In other words we are doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result that isn&#039;t going to occur. 
 I don&#039;t think how we administer the punishments is going to make much difference when everyday we make obtaining alcohol  so convenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a big part of our problem with problem drinkers is that just about everywhere in society that we sell food and fuel we also sell alcohol. I don&#8217;t support prohibition, but I really think as a society we need to look at how we allow alcohol to be advertised and where we allow it to be sold.<br />
 We collect a lot of tax from Alcohol sales, but Alcohol related problems are very expensive to have to deal with and we don&#8217;t seem to be gaining ground in stopping people from being stupid. In other words we are doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result that isn&#8217;t going to occur.<br />
 I don&#8217;t think how we administer the punishments is going to make much difference when everyday we make obtaining alcohol  so convenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perdido fisherman</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/comment-page-1#comment-264176</link>
		<dc:creator>perdido fisherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=175643#comment-264176</guid>
		<description>I agree Danny, a combination of the two with stiff sentences is a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Danny, a combination of the two with stiff sentences is a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DANNY</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/comment-page-1#comment-264084</link>
		<dc:creator>DANNY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=175643#comment-264084</guid>
		<description>Keep the the ignition interlock devices in place and add the 24/7 program. As long as the persons that are on these program are the ones paying for it and not the tax payers. Maybe then they won&#039;t have the money to drink in excess. Personally I would be for revoked license and 1 year injail for the first offence and then 5,10, 20, for the next offences. The punishment needs to be so insufferable that people will stop and  think before they take that drink knowing they will have to drive later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep the the ignition interlock devices in place and add the 24/7 program. As long as the persons that are on these program are the ones paying for it and not the tax payers. Maybe then they won&#8217;t have the money to drink in excess. Personally I would be for revoked license and 1 year injail for the first offence and then 5,10, 20, for the next offences. The punishment needs to be so insufferable that people will stop and  think before they take that drink knowing they will have to drive later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gembeaux</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/comment-page-1#comment-264066</link>
		<dc:creator>Gembeaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=175643#comment-264066</guid>
		<description>I cannot imagine the administrative burden this would become. The answer to repeat offenders (and some first time offenders) is the complete revocation of driving privileges.  And, yes, driving IS a privilege. I am so saddened by the frequency of reports of highway fatalities caused by repeat DUI offenders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot imagine the administrative burden this would become. The answer to repeat offenders (and some first time offenders) is the complete revocation of driving privileges.  And, yes, driving IS a privilege. I am so saddened by the frequency of reports of highway fatalities caused by repeat DUI offenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/comment-page-1#comment-263991</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=175643#comment-263991</guid>
		<description>The lawmakers not only need the laws for heavy drinkers but a much stiffer fine for cell phone users and really higher fines for texting.  This is really taking lives and if not curtailed more and more deaths to innocent ones who they hit while texting,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawmakers not only need the laws for heavy drinkers but a much stiffer fine for cell phone users and really higher fines for texting.  This is really taking lives and if not curtailed more and more deaths to innocent ones who they hit while texting,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justme</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/comment-page-1#comment-263961</link>
		<dc:creator>Justme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=175643#comment-263961</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen people get someone that hasn&#039;t been drinking to &quot;blow start&quot; their car for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen people get someone that hasn&#8217;t been drinking to &#8220;blow start&#8221; their car for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyeswideopen</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/comment-page-1#comment-263951</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeswideopen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=175643#comment-263951</guid>
		<description>I think this may be a good idea as some of the DUI offenders drive other friends vehicles by knowledge, or under the guise their vehicle is broke down since they have the interlocking device.  Believe me  these offenders have been finding ways to get around the law for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this may be a good idea as some of the DUI offenders drive other friends vehicles by knowledge, or under the guise their vehicle is broke down since they have the interlocking device.  Believe me  these offenders have been finding ways to get around the law for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmr</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/comment-page-1#comment-263923</link>
		<dc:creator>bmr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=175643#comment-263923</guid>
		<description>If they would do that it would hit to many political figures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they would do that it would hit to many political figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perdido fisherman</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2014/04/madd-at-odds-over-dui-proposal/comment-page-1#comment-263907</link>
		<dc:creator>perdido fisherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 08:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=175643#comment-263907</guid>
		<description>I agree with MADD, it&#039;s a bad idea to do a twice a day breath test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with MADD, it&#8217;s a bad idea to do a twice a day breath test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
