” “How much discrimination based on the exercise of a constitutional right is tolerable?” Gaetz asked. ”

This is well-intended but stupid.

People’s right to keep and bear arms doesn’t mean others don’t have the right to react to its exercise. It doesn’t matter if homes are safer or more dangerous with weapons on hand; businesses should be free to sell or not sell insurance however they wish just as long as it is spelled out ahead of time. If some try to punish your choices, buy from some other. If you think all insurance companies are out to get you, you may be losing contact with reality or it may be time to form your own insurance company so you can get all the business the others are rejecting or overcharging about.

We SHOULD insist government stay out of our business as much as possible, but every time some group figures they can use the power of government to push their agenda, they decide government interference is reasonable in this case rather than recognizing every time we justify the majority telling the minority what to do, we risk becoming a minority at the wrong end of the process sometime in the future with the majority saying, “You figured it was okay last time, suck it up and take it this time.”

David for a free people

this is essentially a bill designed to stop a back door attempt to control gun ownership by using insurance companies to blackmail homeowners into giving up guns in order to save money.

our right to own guns would exist whether or not the 2nd amendment existed. this to me means the insurance companies get zero say in the matter. pass the bill.