Comments on: Century Council Denies 3 Of 4 Barnyard Animal Variance Applications

By: math education required

math education required — Wed, 09 Apr 2014 18:14:30 +0000

I went to Jay and apparently they didn’t teach me the right kind of math. If you can have one animal like a horse or cow per two acres, wouldn’t you need six acres for two horses and a cow?

By: Michelle

Michelle — Wed, 09 Apr 2014 16:39:56 +0000

What do these “Geniuses” think are going to happen to these animals that will have to be removed from “Over crowding”?
This is a rural area, lots of farms. NOT Metropolis!! IDIOTS!!!

By: just listing

just listing — Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:32:49 +0000

The word “OR” where I came from did not mean “and”. Also, with only Two acres it seems impossible to keep animals “200″ feet from any property line or Dwelling. The council may need to rethink or inspect properties already given a “variance”. Just saying.>

By: nod

nod — Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:24:38 +0000

Hail the power hungry town council. What
Is next, you must paint your house blue?

By: century resident

century resident — Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:19:50 +0000

Shame on you Town Council members. Some of you need to clean your own yard up, it looks like you have animals living there. Did you put in for an ordiance? Election time is coming talk is lot of you are gone.

By: ProudArmyParent

ProudArmyParent — Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:10:30 +0000

hmmmm, “A variance for Willie Owens at 460 Barnwell was denied for two horses because he does not actually own the property, according to county records.”

“The Town of Century has discovered it does not actually own the property that contains all or a portion of four ball fields at a town park”.

Just saying, Not owning property did not stop the Town of Century from building ballparks on property they didn’t own!

I still say the variance is a crock!