Comments on: Senate Panel Backs Bipartisan Tweak To ‘Stand Your Ground’ Law

By: Bill Rayburn

Bill Rayburn — Wed, 19 Mar 2014 20:45:18 +0000

Any time both parties agree, I am REALLY worried. So what is wrong with Stand Your Ground, AS IS.? And when I saw that the Reverand(what an abuse of the word) Al Sharparton marched FOR the Changes. I say no, no, no. Dont ever put me on the same side as that bigot, on anything.

By: Stephen Fletcher

Stephen Fletcher — Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:28:13 +0000

I beleave every right to STAND your ground,WE have the right to defend ourselves no matter what color we may be,We are all humon beings,Don,t need no ones permission, common sence

By: nod

nod — Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:11:24 +0000

so what changed?

By: 429SCJ

429SCJ — Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:35:04 +0000

Stop the crime and mayhem being committed and you won’t need to march.

Some people want to have it both ways and that is the crux of the paradox.

By: Dave S

Dave S — Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:24:19 +0000

Did I miss something? George Zimmerman did not use “Stand Your Ground”. So now all Neighborhood watches have new training…at a significant cost…for no apparent reason. And people can now sue someone that uses “Stand you Ground”. And the police are required to investigate…I am hoping that they have been investigating all along and this is just language put in a bill to appease people. Wow…grandpa always said, “Squeaky wheel gets the grease”.