Comments on: Authorities Believe Murder Victim May Be From Panhandle

By: David Huie Green

David Huie Green — Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:24:58 +0000

You can’t tell age from teeth because she didn’t have any,

Height variation doesn’t make sense to me either.

Sometimes isotopes differ by area, might be detected in her bones and would show up for years after she left or might be current to this area.

Tattoo and location should tell anyone who actually knew her, especially anyone named Jane.

It WOULD be interesting to know more details.

If murder, I hope they catch the killer.

By: Lighten up

Lighten up — Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:18:20 +0000

The broad range of age and height is to leave all options open. They are desperately trying to learn the identity of this woman. If they list criteria that is too narrow, some may not even consider their own opinions on who this might be.

By: Bell

Bell — Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:44:14 +0000

I’m curious as to how they have a 7″ range on her height, when they have her remains. Also a 20 year difference in age when an autopsy was performed, but yet they can determine that she could have lived around here 15 or 20 years ago. Something doesn’t add up. I hope that family will be found and closure will follow. Rest in peace.

By: molino jim

molino jim — Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:36:49 +0000

“Geological testing” showed that she could have lived in the Fla. panhandle within the past 15 to 20 years? I’ve heard of having sand in your shoes but isn’t that a little long?