Comments on: Dept. Of Revenue Employee Charged With Illegally Searching Info On Her Ex

By: Kim

Kim — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:48:31 +0000

Some of you need to stop acting like she did not do anything wrong. Fact is she did. She signed her name to it. She has kids and should have a little sense not to do anything like this on her job. Dang people out here are looking for jobs and she screwed hers up. It does not matter if he pays support or not. You need to handle things the legal way. If not in the end it does not pay off. He is probably setting back laughing at her and I would not blame him. This reminds to of the young man that stole the car in Pensacola then could not drive it. Get for real here people.

By: single parent

single parent — Sat, 22 Jun 2013 04:20:46 +0000

As a single parent that has a father in the system ordered to pay child support. That lives 10min away that does not receive a penny. That has turned in his work place home address tag number and current picture but doesn’t receive a dime. I understand her actions

By: David Huie Green

David Huie Green — Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:40:04 +0000

“Innocent until proven guilty”

But unemployed without pay in the mean time

By: Not an excuse

Not an excuse — Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:20:07 +0000

@ No Excuses……”I work for the DOJ and I have to sign documents outlining what I may and may not do on our computers every year.”

So does Eric Holder…..

By: chris1

chris1 — Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:44:24 +0000

Innocent until proven guilty

By: Parent

Parent — Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:09:08 +0000

The hiring of a attorney is not affordable for most single parents.This is probably a case where child support was not being paid. This is about the system, if it worked more parents would get the financial support needed to raise their children, instead only a select handful get support. If the DOR can’t push a button on a computer that gives them info on the other parent, very little gets done. The legal system needs to crack down on the self employed.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:52:56 +0000

Whether what she did was because the system wasn’t working on the civil side doesn’t give her the right to break a criminal law. Been thru this type thing. Her ‘not thinking right’ has cost her her occupation. Knocking her or the system isn’t going to help anything.

By: Brandi

Brandi — Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:34:41 +0000

I feel so bad for everyone involved. I went to school with this woman and she is a very kind person. Instead of bashing her, for what her mistakes have been, we should pull together and support her. She does have children and though she did do something wrong, they still are her kids. They view this site, I’m sure…we do live in an internet world. I know what it is like to see some nasty comments about my parents on the internet and I can only imagine what these kids must be going through. We need to pray for her and her kids to get through this. We are all humans and we are all guided by human instinct and impulse. What she did was wrong, but what does saying mean things about her accomplish. In the bible, it says “he who is without sin, cast the first stone.” I know I won’t be casting any stones. We wake up every day a product of sin. We are a community that needs to pull together when something happens instead of hurting one another. Take my opinion as that, an opinion and know that Amanda, I am praying for you and your family!

By: dont judge

dont judge — Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:42:39 +0000

@ No Excuses

Do you know what the paper work was that was sent? You work for DOJ not DOR. I’m betting it was a financial affidavit for his employer to fill out. Just like the one DOR told me I could send to my ex’s place of employment. Without their help. I don’t have money for a lawyer so they told me how to do things myself. I’m guessing if you knowthe ins and out of your DOJ job you could do things yourself. Without a lawyer. I work for B.OCC

By: No Excuses

No Excuses — Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:24:47 +0000

@ don’t judge:

I see nothing in the article that says she did this because of needing anything for her kids. What I see is a criminal act to figure out what her ex-spouse was up to, and a request for information from his employer that she was trying to obtain illegally. She needs to go through the proper channels if that is what she was doing. I’m more inclined to think she was “checking him out”.

I work for the DOJ and I have to sign documents outlining what I may and may not do on our computers every year. She KNEW what she was doing was illegal since she’s required to acknowledge that she knows what she can and cannot do.

Many bloggers on here are blasting the system. That’s not what this article is about – it’s about a person who used a position of public trust to commit illegal activities. You go to jail for that if you’re not careful!