<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court: Cops Need Warrant To Look At Cell Phone Pics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northescambia.com/2013/05/supreme-court-cops-need-warrant-to-look-at-cell-phone-pics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2013/05/supreme-court-cops-need-warrant-to-look-at-cell-phone-pics</link>
	<description>Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Huie Green</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2013/05/supreme-court-cops-need-warrant-to-look-at-cell-phone-pics/comment-page-1#comment-203019</link>
		<dc:creator>David Huie Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 23:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=137219#comment-203019</guid>
		<description>REGARDING:
&quot;Either the State failed to argue this critical point or the FLSC are not very tech-savvy.&quot;

How would that differ from being able to wipe information in computers?
Oh, right, it wouldn&#039;t.

Therefore, what difference would mention of that fact make?

Law enforcement officers have the right to search suspects for any dangerous objects. Electronic data aren&#039;t dangerous, so it is not a matter of protecting the officer.

If a search is reasonable, a judge will issue a warrant. 
If a search is a fishing operation, a judge might not be so accommodating.

David for safe police and safe citizens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REGARDING:<br />
&#8220;Either the State failed to argue this critical point or the FLSC are not very tech-savvy.&#8221;</p>
<p>How would that differ from being able to wipe information in computers?<br />
Oh, right, it wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Therefore, what difference would mention of that fact make?</p>
<p>Law enforcement officers have the right to search suspects for any dangerous objects. Electronic data aren&#8217;t dangerous, so it is not a matter of protecting the officer.</p>
<p>If a search is reasonable, a judge will issue a warrant.<br />
If a search is a fishing operation, a judge might not be so accommodating.</p>
<p>David for safe police and safe citizens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2013/05/supreme-court-cops-need-warrant-to-look-at-cell-phone-pics/comment-page-1#comment-202984</link>
		<dc:creator>James Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 14:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=137219#comment-202984</guid>
		<description>Actually, the information on the phone can be destroyed before the issuance of a warrant by using a smartphone app created for that purpose. Either the State failed to argue this critical point or the FLSC are not very tech-savvy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the information on the phone can be destroyed before the issuance of a warrant by using a smartphone app created for that purpose. Either the State failed to argue this critical point or the FLSC are not very tech-savvy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
