Comments on: Escambia Man Charged With DUI Manslaughter http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2 Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:26:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: David Huie Green http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2/comment-page-1#comment-200161 David Huie Green Sat, 20 Apr 2013 16:40:22 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=135265#comment-200161 If I correctly read 17 04/17/2013 BOND SET AT $250,000 C/P FOR CT 1 (KILLING PERSON OR VIABLE FETUS W/VEHICLE), $150,000 C/P FOR CT 2 (DRIVE W/O LICENSE CAUSES DEATH SERIOUS INJURY W/VEHICLE), $250,000 C/P FOR CT 3 (CRASH-LEAVING SCENE INVOLVING DEATH WITHOUT RENDERING AID), $250,000 C/P FOR CT 4 (DUI VEHICLE CAUSE DEATH TO ANY HUMAN OR UNBORN CHILD), $150,000 C/P FOR CT 5 (DUI IN VEHICLE SERIOUS BODILY INJURY TO ANOTHER) AND $150,000 C/P FOR CT 6 (CRASH-LEAVING SCENE INVOLVING INJURY WITHOUT RENDERING AID) 250 150 250 250 150 150 It is now $1,200,000 bond since the judge looked at it. Seems excessive, but should stop him from killing anybody else anytime soon. David for reset buttons If I correctly read

17 04/17/2013 BOND SET AT $250,000 C/P FOR CT 1 (KILLING PERSON OR VIABLE FETUS W/VEHICLE), $150,000 C/P FOR CT 2 (DRIVE W/O LICENSE CAUSES DEATH SERIOUS INJURY W/VEHICLE), $250,000 C/P FOR CT 3 (CRASH-LEAVING SCENE INVOLVING DEATH WITHOUT RENDERING AID), $250,000 C/P FOR CT 4 (DUI VEHICLE CAUSE DEATH TO ANY HUMAN OR UNBORN CHILD), $150,000 C/P FOR CT 5 (DUI IN VEHICLE SERIOUS BODILY INJURY TO ANOTHER) AND $150,000 C/P FOR CT 6 (CRASH-LEAVING SCENE INVOLVING INJURY WITHOUT RENDERING AID)

250
150
250
250
150
150
It is now $1,200,000 bond since the judge looked at it. Seems excessive, but should stop him from killing anybody else anytime soon.

David for reset buttons

]]> By: David Huie Green http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2/comment-page-1#comment-199793 David Huie Green Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:24:04 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=135265#comment-199793 MEDITATING UPON: “David greene the law enforcement officers do in fact set the beginning bond according to the bond for that charge. during first appearance the bond is then adjusted by the judge once probable cause for the arrest has been made.” greene? How hard is it to spell Green? I don’t personally care but careless in little things, careless in other little things. If the state sets bond for various crimes and he is charged with those crimes, then the state set the bond. This unless you think the charges should have been jaywalking without a permit? If the charges don’t apply, he’s had plenty of time for the judge to say so. David for avoiding the need for bond MEDITATING UPON:
“David greene the law enforcement officers do in fact set the beginning bond according to the bond for that charge. during first appearance the bond is then adjusted by the judge once probable cause for the arrest has been made.”

greene? How hard is it to spell Green? I don’t personally care but careless in little things, careless in other little things.

If the state sets bond for various crimes and he is charged with those crimes, then the state set the bond. This unless you think the charges should have been jaywalking without a permit? If the charges don’t apply, he’s had plenty of time for the judge to say so.

David for avoiding the need for bond

]]> By: David Huie Green http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2/comment-page-1#comment-199762 David Huie Green Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:06:12 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=135265#comment-199762 Other David, No, I would not like to face any jury for killing anyone. So far I've managed to avoid that by not killing anyone and not doing things which would make folks suspect me of killing anyone. To be clear, what hearsay and rumors are they spreading? The only one I can see right off hand is an explanation of why he didn't have a driver's license. I don't especially see why it would matter if he really were driving without one. It isn't a witch hunt to express disapproval -- especially since witches didn't exist as charged -- if the event occurred and they have reason to have charged him. Also there will be no burning at the stake or requirement he prove his innocence rather than the state being required to convince an unbiased jury of his peers. It really isn't bigotry if people don't hate him for something other than what he did. To express disapproval of what he is charged with doing is not the same as ruling that he definitely did it as part of a jury. The prosecution will have to prove to an entire jury that he did the crimes, that he was driving, that he ran a stop sign, that he killed, that he ran. All that. If they fail to make their case, he is acquitted and should never have been charged. It is the law. The right to discuss current events is also the law even if it does get all of you excluded from the jury pool. David for freedom under the law Other David,
No, I would not like to face any jury for killing anyone. So far I’ve managed to avoid that by not killing anyone and not doing things which would make folks suspect me of killing anyone.

To be clear, what hearsay and rumors are they spreading? The only one I can see right off hand is an explanation of why he didn’t have a driver’s license. I don’t especially see why it would matter if he really were driving without one.

It isn’t a witch hunt to express disapproval — especially since witches didn’t exist as charged — if the event occurred and they have reason to have charged him. Also there will be no burning at the stake or requirement he prove his innocence rather than the state being required to convince an unbiased jury of his peers.

It really isn’t bigotry if people don’t hate him for something other than what he did. To express disapproval of what he is charged with doing is not the same as ruling that he definitely did it as part of a jury. The prosecution will have to prove to an entire jury that he did the crimes, that he was driving, that he ran a stop sign, that he killed, that he ran. All that.

If they fail to make their case, he is acquitted and should never have been charged.
It is the law. The right to discuss current events is also the law even if it does get all of you excluded from the jury pool.

David for freedom under the law

]]> By: David http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2/comment-page-1#comment-199724 David Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:07:09 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=135265#comment-199724 My point is David Green there are laws for DUI Murder etc... I agree with every one of them. It just bothers me that people as on this post spread hearsay rumors he/she said that that promotes judging within a society consumed with burning a witch at the stake without hearing the other side. Thats what courts are for. I am not saying the man did or did not do anything. But read through this post and tell me you would want any person with that demeanor on a jury trail who has already made up their mind via gossip and rumors. Yet one of these people on this post may be chosen to serve on the jury of this guy and the be a bigot saying they are not swayed. If the man is judged to have been found guilty... I hope it will not be due to a predisposition as what I see here. If guilty..serve the term under the law for which it provides. Its not that confusing David, its the law. My point is David Green there are laws for DUI Murder etc… I agree with every one of them. It just bothers me that people as on this post spread hearsay rumors he/she said that that promotes judging within a society consumed with burning a witch at the stake without hearing the other side. Thats what courts are for. I am not saying the man did or did not do anything. But read through this post and tell me you would want any person with that demeanor on a jury trail who has already made up their mind via gossip and rumors. Yet one of these people on this post may be chosen to serve on the jury of this guy and the be a bigot saying they are not swayed. If the man is judged to have been found guilty… I hope it will not be due to a predisposition as what I see here. If guilty..serve the term under the law for which it provides. Its not that confusing David, its the law.

]]> By: kevin enfinger http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2/comment-page-1#comment-199704 kevin enfinger Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:38:53 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=135265#comment-199704 David greene the law enforcement officers do in fact set the beginning bond according to the bond for that charge. during first appearance the bond is then adjusted by the judge once probable cause for the arrest has been made. in the case of a warrant that is signed by a judge first then yes the judge sets the bond. but for an arrest with no warrant basically being arrested while committing the crime, the officer sets it David greene the law enforcement officers do in fact set the beginning bond according to the bond for that charge. during first appearance the bond is then adjusted by the judge once probable cause for the arrest has been made. in the case of a warrant that is signed by a judge first then yes the judge sets the bond. but for an arrest with no warrant basically being arrested while committing the crime, the officer sets it

]]> By: David Huie Green http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2/comment-page-1#comment-199665 David Huie Green Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:29:51 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=135265#comment-199665 Other David, Are you sure it's wrong to judge people wrong for illegally driving and orphaning babies? If it IS wrong, wouldn't that make judging those who disapprove of DUI manslaughter wrong? This condemnation of condemnation is confusing. David for reasonable consistency Other David,
Are you sure it’s wrong to judge people wrong for illegally driving and orphaning babies? If it IS wrong, wouldn’t that make judging those who disapprove of DUI manslaughter wrong?

This condemnation of condemnation is confusing.

David for reasonable consistency

]]> By: David Huie Green http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2/comment-page-1#comment-199659 David Huie Green Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:16:46 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=135265#comment-199659 Law enforcement officers don't set bond Law enforcement officers don’t set bond

]]> By: Final Justice http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2/comment-page-1#comment-199556 Final Justice Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:18:05 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=135265#comment-199556 Bond is not originally set by a Judge is is set by the arresting officer. Lets hope this fool doesn't go before our favorite "Bet he can do better Bergoff" Bond is not originally set by a Judge is is set by the arresting officer. Lets hope this fool doesn’t go before our favorite “Bet he can do better Bergoff”

]]> By: David http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2/comment-page-1#comment-199526 David Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:00:27 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=135265#comment-199526 With all the rhetoric and judging is wrong. Simply prayers to the family. Leave the judging for the legal system. With all the rhetoric and judging is wrong. Simply prayers to the family. Leave the judging for the legal system.

]]> By: cantonment mom http://www.northescambia.com/2013/04/escambia-man-charged-with-dui-manslaughter-2/comment-page-1#comment-199495 cantonment mom Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:40:27 +0000 http://www.northescambia.com/?p=135265#comment-199495 First, I’d like to offer my condolences to the victim’s family. What a horrible tragedy and I will be keep you in my prayers. I have read the comments below. According to ‘Lillian’, Barclay “He does not hold a drivers license because he was never issued one, not because he lost it. Due to psychiatric issues he should have never been allowed behind the wheel of ANY vehicle. The Jeep he was driving did not belong to him.” If this is the case, it begs the question how did he get the vehicle? Since he is not charged with vehicle theft, it is logical to assume he was given the vehicle to drive. The person who provided him with the vehicle should be charged as well. They provided him with a weapon. This was a VERY preventable tragedy and there are more people with blood on their hands than just the driver! First, I’d like to offer my condolences to the victim’s family. What a horrible tragedy and I will be keep you in my prayers.
I have read the comments below. According to ‘Lillian’, Barclay “He does not hold a drivers license because he was never issued one, not because he lost it. Due to psychiatric issues he should have never been allowed behind the wheel of ANY vehicle. The Jeep he was driving did not belong to him.” If this is the case, it begs the question how did he get the vehicle? Since he is not charged with vehicle theft, it is logical to assume he was given the vehicle to drive. The person who provided him with the vehicle should be charged as well. They provided him with a weapon. This was a VERY preventable tragedy and there are more people with blood on their hands than just the driver!

]]>