Okay, I yield to your superior knowledge of what is a public adjuster. I admit I was thinking that a public adjuster was the insurance companiy representative going to a person who has suffered loss and getting him to accept a settlement less than will actually be needed to make him whole.

I was wrong and ignorant.

Instead, for maybe a twenty-five percent cut, the public adjuster tries to get as much money out of the insurance company as possible. If I were a Republican, this would surely sound like a good business to be in. With my new understanding, I can see how the companies would hate to have them represent the insured for the very reason you pointed out: the more the insured gets, the more he gets.

It is interesting how some instantly jump on the thought that anyone who ever disagrees with them must be a Republican, satanist, Liberal or Communist — whatever they despise. I’ve pointed out before that simply insulting those with whom you disagree is counterproductive since it makes it harder for them to listen to you but I doubt it can be helped.

We are what we are and most are satisfied with that.

David for truth

Let’s see now. They thought adjusters were taking advantage of those suffering loss by paying them off quickly but possibly for less than they would need.
That is a heartless House of Representatives and Senate?

I know some think the Republicans just sit back and try to think of the most evil things they can do, but does that make sense here?
It reads like an attempt to protect people even if it winds up costing the insurance companys more.

David for avoided paranoia

I see public adjusters as a tax adjuster working for YOU not the insurance company. Of course you are going to get better service like that!