At least one other thing, the presumption of innocence.

Oh, and no living witnesses against him regarding the specifics of the encounter, forensic evidence suggesting possible violence against him, screams from someone ere the shooting, reports of the small child beating him rather than him beating the small child, some questions regarding the credibility of some of his accusers..

David counting
while still expecting lynching

The only thing his defense has is his credibility . . . his word that things went down the way he said they did and now that’s shot (pun intended)!

At a wild guess, he was expecting some legal expenses associated with being tried for second degree murder and hoped to get money for his defense. (Either that or he hoped to raise enough money to go to Peru and put all behind him).

David wondering
why any would wonder
why any would want money

The horrible thing here is a kid is dead and these people seem to lie
about everything. I have never been able to believe liers about anything.
It always seems they just have instincts for themselves (cover their
own butts) and it’s been my experience with people that that they do
that because they are ALWAYS in trouble.

At first I thought how stupid it was to be wearing a hoodie in the dark
in an area that has problems so they have a posted neighborhood watch.
Thats just asking for trouble, but this case is all over the place.

I’m beginning think TWO WRONGS STILL DON’T MAKE A RIGHT!
The Boy is gone and this Guy will also soon be gone.

The doubt is regarding another person lied on another matter. Besides, GZ MAY have lied about shooting, everything’s up in the air until a court rules. It isn’t likely but people DO sometimes lie about who actually shot whom. (Remember when John Wayne shot Liberty Valance and Jimmy Stewart thought HE did?)

David for separated questions