Comments on: Women Charged With Repeatedly Tasing Man

By: JIMW

JIMW — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:11:05 +0000

@Jerry A call it what you want but the fact they kept tazing so many times could stop your heart. There is no way to tell if someone has a device or not until they tell you. I highly suspect if you shot or attemped to shoot someone who had one they would let you know immediately. I’m just saying you have a right to have the weapon but please be responsible with it just as you should be with any other weapon. I am a definate supporter of the 2nd Amendment! But it was obvious these two people got carried away with tazing.

By: Michael

Michael — Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:20:31 +0000

And to all you idiots the a taser is a deadly weapon when your using it to cause harm like these fools the police use it to keep harm from them selfs and others but if your going to use it just to cause pain it should be jail time

By: SDH

SDH — Sun, 25 Mar 2012 04:02:54 +0000

terrible what thses 3 did to the victum coming to his home and starting trouble where none was to be found i say prosecute to the fullest

By: SDH

SDH — Sun, 25 Mar 2012 03:46:16 +0000

“SLICK” you can RUN but you will be found…cant believe the example these women are setting for thier own children and grandchildren…I hope and pary they ALL are prosecuted to the fullest…I hear the victum got in a few good licks after he broken free funny it took 3 on 1 not excately an even fight not that i think the victum would ever hit or abuse a woman he was raised better than that

By: 429SCJ

429SCJ — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:07:52 +0000

If these people had driven a vehicle onto my property, assaulted my guest. I don’t know about them, but that vehicle would have been sitting on four flats, no glass and a body full of holes, faster than you can say get off my property. They want shock, How about hydrodynamic shock!

By: Baggzz

Baggzz — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:14:35 +0000

Not Slick…

By: Dola

Dola — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 07:43:39 +0000

I totally agree with the comment made my Alice Harris! AMEN! Also, Wendy… Should have called me if ya needed backup over here on my side woods woman! Peace!

By: SW

SW — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 03:15:52 +0000

A baseball bat in the hand of a person accused is a deadly weapon, too, but not when in the hand of the baseball player.

The same can be said of a car; accused, vs race car driver…or a razor-accused vs barber.

Frying pan (accused vs chef)…

This could go on for a while.

By: Amy352

Amy352 — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 01:17:55 +0000

I know of the younger perp. Frequently in places a young mother need not be. As for Slick, I can just about tell you he is identified. I know this man and he showed up to work the other day with a shiner and cut under is eye. Slick isn’t so slick after all. Jumpin Jack Flash, huh? Guess she was trying to rekindle a romance. Trying to put the spark back in their marriage.

By: David Huie Green

David Huie Green — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:55:49 +0000

REGARDING:
“Law enforcement go thru training so why should civilians not go thru one.”

How quickly we forget the Second Amendment: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. ”

Yes, a taser is electronic but the second amendment doesn’t limit based on that. Yes, it is less lethal than a well used musket, but the second amendment doesn’t limit rights based on that.

Nobody has to pass a test to own arms. They can be prosecuted if they misuse them, but that’s a separate question.

David for better living through electricity