<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scott Signs Education Bills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northescambia.com/2011/06/scott-signs-education-bills/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2011/06/scott-signs-education-bills</link>
	<description>Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:06:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SW</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2011/06/scott-signs-education-bills/comment-page-1#comment-89764</link>
		<dc:creator>SW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=58376#comment-89764</guid>
		<description>Remaining in state control encourages statist agendas and poor curriculum.  We have all been complaining about the poor educational system; keeping it with the people who failed it and throwing more money at it certainly can&#039;t be a good thing.  

I&#039;m sorry, but I disagree.  Keeping it local enables it to be more closely monitored by the community.  Keeping it local also keeps the tax money in the community instead of redistributing it all over the state.  

I presume keeping unions in place would be a good thing as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remaining in state control encourages statist agendas and poor curriculum.  We have all been complaining about the poor educational system; keeping it with the people who failed it and throwing more money at it certainly can&#8217;t be a good thing.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I disagree.  Keeping it local enables it to be more closely monitored by the community.  Keeping it local also keeps the tax money in the community instead of redistributing it all over the state.  </p>
<p>I presume keeping unions in place would be a good thing as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Broel</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2011/06/scott-signs-education-bills/comment-page-1#comment-89760</link>
		<dc:creator>James Broel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=58376#comment-89760</guid>
		<description>The reason schools can&#039;t be turned to local control in my view would be because the local communities can&#039;t run them as well. There would be far too much bias. We need this to remain in state control not by individual school systems or county government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason schools can&#8217;t be turned to local control in my view would be because the local communities can&#8217;t run them as well. There would be far too much bias. We need this to remain in state control not by individual school systems or county government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SW</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2011/06/scott-signs-education-bills/comment-page-1#comment-89649</link>
		<dc:creator>SW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=58376#comment-89649</guid>
		<description>Why not introduce and then sign a presented bill eliminating the state board of education entirely?  Why not turn schools back over to local control?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not introduce and then sign a presented bill eliminating the state board of education entirely?  Why not turn schools back over to local control?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
