Comments on: DCF Hurries To Get Ready To Test New Welfare Applicants

By: Steven

Steven — Sat, 02 Jul 2011 04:17:43 +0000

Replay to MolinoGurl……

When you drug test for a job, you are watched as well. It is to ensure that you are actually giving a sample from your own body. There are many people that know they will fail a drug test, so come prepared with someone else’s urine in a bottle or whatever, trying to “cheat” on the drug test. I have taken several drug tests for positions in the past, and there has ALWAYS been a witness to prevent “cheating”. If the private working sector can deal with it, so can people getting cash assistance from welfare. Personally, I fully support this bill. And yes, I was on welfare at one point in my life, and would have supported it even then. If you ever want to open your eyes to why this bill is there, just hang out at a convenience store for a while. Watch someone come in with a pocket full of cash, buying beer and blunts to wrap and get high, then pull out an EBT card to pay for snacks for all their friends. I see it every day. Until the welfare system is revoked, this is a needed thing. The only thing about it that should change is that the fact it should be for ALL welfare recipients…….even those that only get Food assistance and/or medicaid. But, as with everyone else on here, its only my opinion.

By: sktmax

sktmax — Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:41:42 +0000

This legislation of drug testing state employees and welfare recipients is nothing but a gift for Rick Scott’s Solantic clinic chains. The company that he moved shares into his wifes name to avoid “conflict of interest” after being elected. But even after more ethics complaints, he has reportdedly sold the company. Of course the figures havent been released but Florida business journals estimate a huge profit. Put yourself in his shoes. You could make all this money, and who is going to be against dealing with drug heads abusing tax payer money? It’s actually quite clever if it wasnt so corrupt.

By: David Huie Green

David Huie Green — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:20:04 +0000

REGARDING:
“If you can afford to buy illegal drugs—-are you poor??”

It is possible to be both poor and using illegal drugs. And some buy illegal drugs who can’t afford them but do it anyway. Consider the number of people who can’t afford legal cigarettes or beer, but do anyway.

Poverty is defined by the government.
Per http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/09poverty.shtml

The 2009 Poverty Guidelines for the 48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia
Persons in family/ Poverty guideline
1 $10,830
2 $14,570
3 $18,310
4 $22,050
5 $25,790
6 $29,530
7 $33,270
8 $37,010
For families with more than 8 persons, add $3,740 for each additional person.

Let’s see, working 40 hours per week, $10 per hour, 50 weeks per year would earn $20,000 per year (just for ease of figuring, obviously some would work for less, some for more, some less time, some more time.) would put a family of 4 below the poverty line.
Not working at all would put everybody below the poverty line.
Not declaring income would officially put some below the poverty line.

Some drugs are cheap, some users don’t use as much as others. Some illegal drugs can be grown in your own back yard.

David considering priorities and criteria

By: sue

sue — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:02:13 +0000

Seems like a waste of money to me…are there going to be rehab centers available for people that are in the grips of addiction…some sanctimonious people seem to think that drug addiction is just something you can have or not have. There are some drugs that will affect your brain so deeply that you would cut your finger off for another fix. Instead of more money spent in prisons; there needs to be more addiction specialists & rehab counselors available to the poor & uninsured. It is mostly the poverty stricken people with little hope for their future that become addicted to drugs; it makes them forget their emotional pain for awhile & before long they are so hooked that the brain craves the drug. People that do not suffer from addiction problems are very judgmental unless they know someone in the beast of a disease. I believe rehab would be alot cheaper than prison & give the person a chance to become a productive member of society.

By: Just wondering

Just wondering — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:58:07 +0000

If you can afford to buy illegal drugs—-are you poor??

By: Fairlane63

Fairlane63 — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:27:21 +0000

This is a step in the right direction– a better solution would be to get rid of welfare. Why should the government confiscate money from me and give it to someone else?

By: MolinoGurl*

MolinoGurl* — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:06:26 +0000

And from what I have been told they went into the Restroom with people and WATCHED them do the drug test, that is a little extreme don’t ya think to not even give someone privacy? They should pat people down 1st or something before letting them go in the room not watch them.

By: Paper Makers Better Half

Paper Makers Better Half — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:05:52 +0000

Dear Miss Kathy, How poor can you be if you can still buy drugs? If you test negative you will be reimbursed the cost of the test. I see nothing but a win-win policy. Those who really need the help will be helped and those who do not will be WEEDED out.

By: Jack

Jack — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:59:21 +0000

“Among a litany of concerns from stakeholders, including Florida Legal Services and the ACLU, were questions of whether applicants who test positive for drugs would be immediately flagged by DCF and risk having their children removed from their custody.”

Seems like this would be a given. When DCF discovers a hazardous situation for children shouldn’t they be like any good citizen and report it?

Why is this a concern?

By: Kathy

Kathy — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:55:32 +0000

I guess Ricky is making sure his cronies make a little money off the poor.