<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W.D. Childers Bribery Case Headed To Federal Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northescambia.com/2010/11/w-d-childers-bribery-case-headed-to-federal-court/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2010/11/w-d-childers-bribery-case-headed-to-federal-court</link>
	<description>Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 18:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Huie Green</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2010/11/w-d-childers-bribery-case-headed-to-federal-court/comment-page-1#comment-60266</link>
		<dc:creator>David Huie Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=34908#comment-60266</guid>
		<description>REGARDING:
&quot;the tax-payers were responsible&quot;

Sad we don&#039;t get more credit, isn&#039;t it? In fact, they call us stingy when we refuse to fund something and then they take the credit if we do. I&#039;ve noticed when looking at the state budget for funding they simply say the State funded this program to the tune of this much money, the state funded that program to the tune of that much money. It&#039;s hard to track down how much the taxpayers funded the state through sales taxes, corporate income tax, Obama gifts, fees.

Still, the idea is that he got the state to spend the money on that particular item. Looking back, the purchase over which he got so many in trouble seems like a good buy, just done illegaly.

David for crediting taxpayers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REGARDING:<br />
&#8220;the tax-payers were responsible&#8221;</p>
<p>Sad we don&#8217;t get more credit, isn&#8217;t it? In fact, they call us stingy when we refuse to fund something and then they take the credit if we do. I&#8217;ve noticed when looking at the state budget for funding they simply say the State funded this program to the tune of this much money, the state funded that program to the tune of that much money. It&#8217;s hard to track down how much the taxpayers funded the state through sales taxes, corporate income tax, Obama gifts, fees.</p>
<p>Still, the idea is that he got the state to spend the money on that particular item. Looking back, the purchase over which he got so many in trouble seems like a good buy, just done illegaly.</p>
<p>David for crediting taxpayers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheated Tax Payer</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2010/11/w-d-childers-bribery-case-headed-to-federal-court/comment-page-1#comment-60225</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheated Tax Payer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=34908#comment-60225</guid>
		<description>&quot;Most notably for North Escambia, Childers was the man responsible for the funding to four-lane Highway 29 to the Alabama state line.&quot;


I would disagree with this; the tax-payers were responsible for the funding of the road project. This wasn&#039;t any act of &quot;benevolence&quot; on W.D.&#039;s part. It was part of what he was supposed to do for his district. 

No doubt his own ego and arrogance led to his downfall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most notably for North Escambia, Childers was the man responsible for the funding to four-lane Highway 29 to the Alabama state line.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would disagree with this; the tax-payers were responsible for the funding of the road project. This wasn&#8217;t any act of &#8220;benevolence&#8221; on W.D.&#8217;s part. It was part of what he was supposed to do for his district. </p>
<p>No doubt his own ego and arrogance led to his downfall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
