I agree but point out that you can no longer decide what you can do with your “private” property. We already have zoning restricting what you can do. The difference is that currently to change it, you have to convince a few people and as proposed you would have to convince a majority of those affected by your plans.

For example, if prostitution were legal, you could easily convince a few commissioners to allow you to open a brothel but it might be harder to convince your neighbors it was a good idea. Other money-makers are currently legal but might not be welcome and who knows what will be legal in the future?

David knowing it would restrict development

http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Florida_Class_Size,_Amendment_8_%282010%29

And about Amendment 4, which gives voters in their communities a voice in what development projects are approved. It’s clear that the Escambia County Board of Education doesn’t want voters to have a say in development of the land in their community.

http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Florida_Comprehensive_Land_Use_Plans,_Amendment_4_%282010%29

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/amendment-8-asks-florida-voters-to-reconsider-class-sizes/1115586

Is it appropriate for a Board of Education to be issuing statements such as this, especially when those statements are misleading? Jus’ sayin’

I think that crowd is better suited for the private school sector, where they could have 40 kids in a class and all the parents that don’t care how many students are in their childrens’ classroom could send their kids there to the Loud Crowd School.

If you are simply content with your child waiting longer with his/ her hand in the air waiting for the teacher to answer their question then vote yes for Amendment 8.

If you like waiting in the longest line possible then vote yes for Amendment 8. This is what will be created by the amendment. As many kids will be stuffed into classrooms as possible. We all know children have to go one at a time.