<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Escambia Oil Spill Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northescambia.com/2010/05/saturday-escambia-oil-spill-update/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2010/05/saturday-escambia-oil-spill-update</link>
	<description>Local News for Molino, Bratt, McDavid, Century, Walnut Hill, Cantonment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Huie Green</title>
		<link>http://www.northescambia.com/2010/05/saturday-escambia-oil-spill-update/comment-page-1#comment-43517</link>
		<dc:creator>David Huie Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 22:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northescambia.com/?p=17460#comment-43517</guid>
		<description>from:
http://www.offshore-mag.com/index/article-display/7861410584/articles/offshore/deepwater-horizon/deepwater-horizon18.html

&quot; . . . . . BP is preparing to deploy the lower marine riser package (LMRP) cap containment system in the event the top kill process does not stop the flow. This deployment would involve removing the damaged riser to give the LMRP a clean-cut pipe to connect to and seal against. The tool already is on the seabed alongside the BOP. 

Another parallel plan being moved forward in case it is needed is the addition of a second BOP to land atop the damaged one. 

Surface containment and collection and shoreline protection efforts also are on-going. BP says there are 1,300 vessel involved along with 360 mi of containment boom and 237 mi of absorbent boom. 

05/28/2010&quot;

just thought I&#039;d share the information in case you wondered what was next. The report is already two days old, but the source is more likely to know what is going on than many who claim to know.

I assume all this is subject to Presidential approval, but also assume our President already knows since he stays on top of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from:<br />
<a href="http://www.offshore-mag.com/index/article-display/7861410584/articles/offshore/deepwater-horizon/deepwater-horizon18.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.offshore-mag.com/index/article-display/7861410584/articles/offshore/deepwater-horizon/deepwater-horizon18.html</a></p>
<p>&#8221; . . . . . BP is preparing to deploy the lower marine riser package (LMRP) cap containment system in the event the top kill process does not stop the flow. This deployment would involve removing the damaged riser to give the LMRP a clean-cut pipe to connect to and seal against. The tool already is on the seabed alongside the BOP. </p>
<p>Another parallel plan being moved forward in case it is needed is the addition of a second BOP to land atop the damaged one. </p>
<p>Surface containment and collection and shoreline protection efforts also are on-going. BP says there are 1,300 vessel involved along with 360 mi of containment boom and 237 mi of absorbent boom. </p>
<p>05/28/2010&#8243;</p>
<p>just thought I&#8217;d share the information in case you wondered what was next. The report is already two days old, but the source is more likely to know what is going on than many who claim to know.</p>
<p>I assume all this is subject to Presidential approval, but also assume our President already knows since he stays on top of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
